[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Notice to Brinks

Subject: Re: Notice to Brinks
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 00:10:14 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <4727aed2$0$26368$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47280615$0$9616$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4727fcb4$0$26436$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4727fcb4$0$26436$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:47280615$0$9616$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > No offense Bob but why would they care to tell you or anyone else here?
>
> Heck it would be nice if they would point it out to the court atleast.

Thats something different although that isn't the current legal issue up for
debate, I'm just pointing out they don't have to prove squat to any of us
here including the Perry Mason wannabee's

(present company excluded)

Prev by Message: Re: PIRs for house with ceiling heating & cooling vents and "pets"!
Next by Message: Re: cctv camera no image
Previous by thread: Re: What's with all the Brinks threads?
Next by thread: Re: Notice To Brinks
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home