[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera

Subject: Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
From: Cam-man <none@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:39:14 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <bsouu2hrql8lcqrka906qlo1r4ba7j8ajd@xxxxxxx> <45ef90f1$0$24699$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <obd1v217qi1grq9ir77alktdsngv3kpcri@xxxxxxx> <45f14e8d$0$28119$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mofIh.12880$4D.4814@pd7urf2no>

Matt Ion inspired greatness with:

>> I think idea #2 is workable. The wire distances are too great for idea #1.
>
>Seconded. Ethernet spec maxes out at around 300ft. for 10/100Mbit over Cat-5/5e.
>  It MAY work on longer runs, but the reliability drops of pretty quickly beyond
>the spec distance.


I didn't think the Ethernet idea all the way through regarding extra
switches along the path.  Methinks idea #2 is best too.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
  - From: Roland Moore

References:
- Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
  - From: Cam-man
- Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
  - From: Cam-man
- Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
  - From: Matt Ion

Prev by Message: Re: Selecting a remote surv system
Next by Message: Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
Previous by thread: Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
Next by thread: Re: Hey Roland and others: Arecont Vision 1.3 Mpixel Network(IP) Camera
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home