[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company

Subject: Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
From: "crash" <crash@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:27:36 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <FKGGh.1214119$1T2.847314@pd7urf2no> <45eb8894$0$498$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45eb94b4$0$28181$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45ec2945$0$505$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45eccb70$0$1396$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

So..like..bots are exempt?


"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45eccb70$0$1396$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> That was a bot
>
> "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:45ec2945$0$505$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <deepvoice> Yes, I did, I just forgot the tags</deepvoice>
>>
>> What a freeking maroon. What's this werld coming to anyway? The
>> "deserve",
>> not earn...fucked up man.
>>
>>
>
>

References:
- Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
  - From: Kyle Summers
- Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
Next by Message: Re: CO2 Placement
Previous by thread: Re: Why Google Is Failing as a Online Advertising Company
Next by thread: Video Evidence Q & A
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home