[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: silent or audible



"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4660d25c$0$3571$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> How about a silent local alarm...yeah that's the ticket!

Sounds like CP-01 to me,.  LOL.




> "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:p948i.152903$Fk2.83869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | In most cases I believe audible is better, the purpose of an alarm from
> a
> | customers point of view is probably to reduce the chance of a burglary
> and
> | in the event of a burglary to minimize the loss, not necessarily to
> capture
> | a burglar. An audible alarm is hopefully going to drive the intruder out
> of
> | the property before they have a chance to find anything of real value.
> If
> | police response was guaranteed within a few minutes then a silent alarm
> may
> | be the way to go, but in many areas police response is abysmal, in large
> | part due to the number of false alarms generated by alarm systems,
> silent
> | alarms only add to that problem since the property owner is unaware that
> | they have caused a false alarm until the police arrive.
> |
> | Doug
> |
> |
> | "Survey" <nospam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:3WX7i.7866$FN5.5593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > Is silent or audible better for a burglar alarm?  when would one be
> better
> | > that the other?  obviously silent for hold up?  do police like to
> "catch"
> | > the perps with a silent alarm?  or just scare them away with the siren
> and
> | > problem's over?
> | > TIA
> | >
> |
> |
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home