Re: Brinks Attorney Information Part 3

["Voice of Reason" <vor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:46a8f20d$0$30635$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> It's all public information. What wrong with it? As each day passes, I
> will post more information as I find it. It's better than going postal,
> don't ya think?

No.  At least if you went postal you wouldn't be spamming the group
and making current and future readers have to wade through the spew.
Don't make the mistake of thinking they'll actually read it, either.  The
spewage just makes you look like a kook, and that can't possibly
help you.  People will just killfile you and blow off what you have to
say.

Note that someone important might interpret your posting of email
address lists as an attempt to have them harvested/spammed (an overt
act intended to cause damages).  They might interpret your comment
above as a sign that you have considered, or may very will consider in
the future, actually going postal.  Opposing counsel... particularly if
they are well funded, can dredge up every little thing you do and pile
it onto the case against you.  Little things add up even when they
shouldn't.

If you want publicity, carefully document the issue and put something
appropriate up on a website.  Not a ton of worthless data mind you,
but a concise easy to digest summary with links to more highly relevant
and detailed info.  Then put a one-liner and link to that website in your
signature and include that signature in posts and emails and such.  Hell,
take out ads for the website if you want to. Act sane and invite people
to learn about things and possibly even help you.  Don't shove it down
their throats though, you know what I mean?