Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit

["Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Folks that have never been carpet bombed by the legal system sometimes don't
fully understand that it is a process that even in victory can leave you
defeated. Jim has joined an attorney enrichment program, but it seems has
not really got with the program. Once a deputy shows up with the default
judgement to get his boat, or car, or whatever Brinks wants to get I think
it will begin to come into focus a little better on what he should do.

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bed8c2e6a6bbe851027d186fb4a81760@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jim, I don't think you realize it, but you are in BAD legal trouble, and
> you have less than one week to deal with it.  You are in desperate need of
> a lawyer.  YOU NEED A LAWYER, TODAY!
>
> You have not filed an adequate legal answer to Brink's lawsuit.
> Consequently, the court clerk has already entered a default against you,
> and Brink's is moving for a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against you.  That means they
> win, and you are going to owe them money.  The hearing on this motion is
> scheduled for July 16.
>
> This is not small claims court.  You don't just write the judge a letter
> explaining your side of this.  You have to follow the rules!  If you had
> more time, I would suggest that you look for the pro se litigant's
> handbooks published by several federal courts, but you don't have time.
> You need a lawyer right now!
>
> Your lawyer may be able to get this case transferred to a federal court in
> Florida, but the Texas judge is probably pissed off at you for ignoring
> them, and may not be inclined to do you any favors.  But right now, your
> priority is to avoid having a default judgment entered.
>
> Drop whatever else you are doing and take care of this immediately.  This
> is deadly serious business.
>
> - badenov
>