[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit

Subject: Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
From: "Buggs" <thatsallfolksl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:07:56 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <468e8aeb$0$12231$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46927329$0$15014$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4692d5c4$0$4661$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4692e59a$0$8018$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mark Leuck wrote:
> Look its real simple,
>
> 1. Let it go to court
> 2. Let them call you to the stand
> 3. When the Brinks lawyer demands you answer questions say these two
> words very slowly and very carefully "Noba Bascoba"
> 4.
> 5. Get up, thank the court and walk out the door, there is nothing
> they can do, case dismissed
>
> Trust me

Noba Bascoba?
js

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
  - From: Jim

References:
- Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
  - From: Just Looking
- Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: techman panel unlocking
Next by Message: Approved 2-wire smokes for ELK M1G
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
Next by thread: Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas Lawsuit
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home