Re: 707 Roll.

["I brive a dus" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>]

FIRETEK (change-the-ch-to-k) wrote:
>> > Nope.  Not even close.  Tom and I had a major arguement a few years ago.
> > I don't like his business model and I said so.
>
> Heh...  sure...  Years of flames followed this simple statement.  You're an
> idiot if you expect anyone to believe this "hokum". <

OK so you want to throw my name into this thread. That's fine. I'm
feeling froggy.
How would you know that the flames lasted for years if you've just
recently started visiting here? It was a great flame fest. Shame you
missed it (or did you?).

> > Presumably, he isn't fond of mine either.  I checked him out with the
> state and
> > he believes that I filed a complaint but he's wrong.
>
> Is that anything like Frank calling ADI and asking what's required to
> purchase product from them in Florida? <

I was calling everyone and their cousin down there long before Frank.
I've got news for you. For all of the yapping the Florida board does
they didn't do diddly dick when they actually had the chance. Robert
left himself wide open for a shot when he first got to Florida. He was
offering monitoring on his website and didn't have any disclaimers
regarding Florida residents. I grabbed the opportunity and called the
ECLB. They did NOTHING! NADA. The Hula Hoop. The Big O. They sat on
their asses and told me there was nothing they could do.
Anyway Robert covered himself when he adjusted his website.
6 years later he's still listening to who from the ECLB is going to do
what and how they will do it. Are they threatening him because of my
call? Nope. The threats were triggered from a flame fest between Robert
and some folks from the Florida board. When they had him dead to rights
they did nothing because it wasn't important enough to them but the
second he called them morons they want to hang him. So at what point do
you start thinking that maybe the Florida board doesn't know it's ass
from a hole in the ground, or is more concerned with settling personal
beefs than with protecting the citizens of Florida?


> > I never filed a formal complaint against him or anyone else.
>
> You not only filed a "formal" complaint against Graham but a whole plane
> load of pilots at some place called "Pinkneyville".  I understand it was all
> based on lies, innuendo, and good deal of personal animus.  Did it make you
> feel good doing that? <

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh an innuendo. The famous Italian suppository

> >  He may have done the same or even gone farther.  I forget what he said
> > about that.  It's water over the dam.
>
> Sure, Bass.  Mighty "big" of you.<

That would be water under the bridge. I'd say it's case closed because
of what I explained earlier. There gets to be a point where the devil
you know is better than the hypocrites you don't know.  We'll disagree
on most things involving business and politics but our opinions will
never be a mystery.

> > Notwithstanding the prior unpleasantness, Tom has since done a few things
> > that earned him my respect.  First, he refused to join the
> > slime-balls who rejoiced when I got cancer.
>
> I seem to recall Frank stating much the same thing.  He even wished you a
> Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
>
> > Second, he worked to help feed needy people during the holidays.  I doubt
> we'll ever be
> > pals but I believe in giving respect where it's due.
>
> Uh-huh.  I also noticed how you "declared" your generosity as well.  What
> does that book "you say you know" have to say about such public
> demonstrations of charity and self-righteousness?  Who are you out to
> impress?  Or is it that you want someone to "pat" you on the back? <

Who the hell was going to pat him on the back? Be honest. Robert knows
that anything he posts here will immediately be a target (at times
rightfully so), and that posting a reply regarding the food drive would
be viewed only as him clamoring for attention instead of him doing
something decent. Being we don't accept email from each other where did
you want him to respond? The intention of my post was to thank him
anyway.

> > Olson has done nothing to earn anyone's respect.
>
> The fact that he's no longer flaming you when all you do is publicly attack
> his integrity impresses the heck out of me.  The fact that you continue to
> repeat the same old lies just proves to me (and everyone else that reads
> this group) that you're a person with little substance and even less moral
> fibre and self esteem.<

Those 2 have been hammering away at each other so much they should just
tie the knot and get it over with already. Now before we do that
there's a little matter of the names going on the wedding license. One
would be Robert L. Bass. What is the other name? Frank ____________?

> > He's no different from Cracker, except he's a little slicker.  You're
> pretty much
> > the same as Olson
>
> You mean I've "got your number" and know exactly where you're coming from?
>
> > -- assuming you aren't just a sock puppet.
>
> In your dreams, little man.
>
> > You hide behind an alias.  So what was that about smallness???
>
> After witnessing the "special treatment" you provide your detractors, you
> expect me to tell you who I am?  How many AHJ's and regulatory agencies are
> you gonna phone to check up on my credentials? <

Folks attacking him who stay anonymous burns his ass. It's funny
watching him search for info on you guys but by same token it's comical
watching grown men hiding from someone who they claim can't harm them.
It's like whistling in a graveyard. What are you hiding from if you
have nothing to fear?

You guys need new flame material BADLY.