Re: Problem With ADT System - Need Advice

["Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>There is a better solution... Sonitrol Security... call for a presentation
>and evaluate for yourself

Sonitrol is nothing more than a type of listen in technology. That kind of
technology is great for alarm verification and little else. Listening to
Sonitrol Security success stories is like listening to someone talk about
all the good things that Hitler did. Why don't you include how many missed
break-ins and law suits they have? Do you or does anyone really want some
central station operator making a decision about your life and property only
by what he or she hears? I was at a high profile soft drink manufacturer
today listening to how proud the customer was of us because she saw in the
local news where our system caught the bad guy at a nearby arena major
events venue. Lots of folks posting here have similar success stories to
tell. In our case it wouldn't have happened that way using Sonitrol, and I
bet the others here would say the same thing. I can tell you for certain
after using MGI and other now defunct manufacturers of similar product that
it isn't what you seem to think it is. If it was every insurance company out
there would be getting their customers to use it and making a ton of money
from reduced loses.

You're almost right though in your statement. Let me help you.
>There is a better solution... Sonitrol Pornography... call for a special
>presentation and ejaculate yourself.

"pyro" <pound.sand@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NTfph.4108$Ul4.3298@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Hey I can expect these kinds of responses. You can't do what Sonitol does
> because your technology is limited and antiquated. I have seen multiple
> complaints that's say ADT installed their system and it did not work
> properly, so they brought in Bay to Monitor and they did not work out, so
> then they brought in Post, same problems. It does not take a rocket
> scientist to figure out that it is  not the  "monitoring company" that is
> at fault, it is the system / technology.
>
> I got a buddy that works for ADT, I know exactly what they say about the
> product. You have to get a competitive edge. A traditional systems ONLY
> advantage is that everyone  (or just about everyone) sell the same crap.
> Therefore the customer has know where to go and eventually excepts what
> they got... OR they switch companies, feel better for a while... and the
> cycle starts again.
>
> Hey all system have failure rates. Nobody is perfect. You say you see
> Sonitrol Systems in abandon buildings, and you also see ADT, Honeywell,
> Bay, Post and a hundred other small and pop shops.
>
> Oh, by the way... who is Robert Bass and why does he or anybody else think
> he is so smart? He sounds like the typical old consultant type trying to
> hang on the only technology he possess and makes every excuse in the book
> for why it dose not work except for the relevant excuse. The technology
> never worked well...ever but is was the only available option.
>
> There is a better solution... Sonitrol Security... call for a presentation
> and evaluate for yourself
>
>
> "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1168453822.760302.160820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> pyro wrote:
>>> Want to really fix the on going issue??
>>>
>>> Drop ADT or any system that is motion detector based. The problem is the
>>> technology not the company. Go wih Sonitrol Security. No motion
>>> detectors
>>> and their system has a variety of other advantages all based on thier
>>> technology.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You WERE replying on the subject regarding the lowest member of the
>> evolutionary scale .... weren't you?
>>
>
>