[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: MI5 Persecution: Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Insurance, Pizza Delivery, Auro Body Repair and Privite Investigations Group



Para-noia (paranoia) - look it up in the dictionary, then make an
appointment to see your regular nut doctor.   Your medications have run out
and you need to get the script filled, again.

"MI5 - Yes we really are watching you, and sending secret brain waves that
can only be blocked by wearing tinfoil hats."   Direct quotation transcribed
from Top Secret documents obtained from unknown source.


<MI5Victim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:m07000407002717@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Investigations Group
>
> In July 1994 the private detective agency Nationwide Investigations Group
> conducted an electronic counter-surveillance
> sweep of my parents' home in London. They checked for radio transmitter
> devices, and tested the telephone line for attached
> bugs. They found nothing.
>
> I am afraid that I was unsurprised at their not finding any evidence of
> covert surveillance. It had been made very clear to me,
> particularly during 1990-92, that audio, and almost certainly video,
> surveillance of my parents' home was taking place. But this
> would not have been made quite so obvious unless the persecutors were
> confident of their apparatus being undetectable using the
> technology the police, or a private agency like Nationwide, would be
> using.
>
> I don't know very much about the surveillance technology that has been
> used against me, but I understand that devices can be built
> which switch off on receiving a coded command, and may switch on again
> after a counter- surveillance sweep has completed; that devices
> may rapidly alter the frequency of transmission, "frequency-hopping"
> devices which presumably cannot be detected in a sequential scan
> of the sort employed by Nationwide; and of course "probe" microphones can
> be inserted "through-the-wall", although I hesitate to
> believe our neighbours would permit this.
>
> We paid Nationwide £411.25 (including VAT) for the surveillance sweep,
> which took them about an hour and a half to complete, using
> a "Professional 5000 multi-scanner, CCL UHF scanner and Guideline
> telephone tap detector." As I said above, I don't know very much
> about these things, so I can't comment on the capabilities or otherwise of
> this equipment. But clearly the "watchers" are using
> technology which in 1994 was beyond the detection capabilities of a good
> private detective agency.
>
> 244
>




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home