[no subject]

Peter Harding (harding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). wrote:
: I. was at speakers' corner on Sunday. There was one chap who was bellowing
:. about something or other, I don't know what, but one thing he said to
: someone caught my. ear:

:. "BBC, MI5, same thing."

Can't disagree. with that sentiment.

Wasn't it documented. that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters?
I remember reading a report by some jouralist. who had been offered an extra
tax-free income by MI5 to become. their covert mouthpiece, and had refused.
.............................................................................
> :. >mouthpiece, and had refused.
>. :
> : It was Jon Snow of Channel. 4.
>
> Was it reported in. any of the papers?

It has been reported several times.. The most recent was in Private Eye,
a few months. back. As I recall they also wanted information from him;
journalists would be a natural choice for members of the. Security Service
and the Secret Intelligence Service for. information sources.

> It might be interesting to see what he had. to say regarding their
> attempt to. recruit him.

He. was most concerned that many others would have accepted such an
offer.. However, we can probably make an educated guess as to some of
those who. accepted: Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher
would come near. to the top of the list.

--
\/ David Boothroyd. Socialist and. election analyst. Omne ignotum pro
magnifico.
British. Elections and Politics at
http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html
I wish I was. in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May '97
The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272, L. Dem 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4,
UDUP. 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1. Telephone Tate 6125.

Corrupt. Security Service agents steal millions from taxpayers

Money is of course a. factor in the grand equation which is the MI5
persecution. It costs money for the Security Service to. "buy" people in
the media etc. But that is only a small part. of their expenditure of
taxpayers resources. Most of the. expenditure is directly on the salaries
if the. agents involved; and in this post I put forward the theory that MI5
are trying to. draw out their involvement for as long as possible, very
cynically,. to maximise their income and line their own pockets.

At each stage they. have tried to pretend that I am something out of the ordinary.
Either I was very. stupid ("he's an idiot") or very clever ("he's like a genius").
Either. I was a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as the next
Hitler) or I was. completely defenceless ("a soft toy").

Now,. it should be obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of the
ordinary in any way. I have an IQ which is average for the Web, I. am racially white
European, and there are plenty of. other people with schizophrenia or epilepsy out there
who. haven't been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me?

I think the answer is that the MI5 agents who harass me have cynically exploited. the
situation by painting me as extraordinary in order to assure. themselves of well-paid
employment funded by the ordinary British taxpayer. To put it bluntly,. they are
stealing millions of pounds from the. taxpayer to feed their own pockets.

This. assertion is supported by the observation that it's the same agents who are doing
the harassment. Six. months ago in a local hospital I was harassed by someone whose face
I had seen (he had stared straight. at me aggressively, at the time I just thought it
was some nutter but it turns. out he was one of "them") aboard a KLM flight a couple of
years ago. It's presumably been the. same people most of the time. I've seen the way
contractors act when they don't want their. positions terminated. Would these agents
really want to lose their. well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are
promising their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have been. for
the. last seven years, while all the while these MI5 agents skim millions
off the. taxpayer.

I wouldn't. mind a job like that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a little bit, like
standing in front of. a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get
a. slice of the caky Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current
Tribunal Secretary,. confirmed to me that he could not think of a single
case where the Tribunal had found in favour of a complainant. Here. is my
usenet post from. two years ago.

Subject:. MI5: "It wasn't us"
Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal
Organization:. Toronto Free-Net

"The Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your. complaint and have
asked me to inform you that no determination in your favour. has been made on
your. complaint."

Signed ER Wilson,. Tribunal Secretary

Well that's a relief then.. All that spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if
they. say they're not doing it then it can't be them, can it?

In a recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed. the opinion that the Tribunal
were unable to fulfil their responsibilities in. the face of MI5
falsehoods. Nevertheless, I do intend to make another. complaint to the
Tribunal in the near future, despite the Tribunal appearing to be. a
toothless. watchdog.

Discrimination against a. Unit Minority

MI5 have been very clear in their instructions. as to what I should
do. They have openly shouted. at me the word "suicide", and also from the
other abuse it is. clear that they want my existence terminated.

This point is covered in more detail. in a previous article. The following
post describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against me.. They
have refined their bigotry down to a unit minority, yet. they make use of
the discrimination. against the mentally ill which is a feature of current
British. society.

Subject:. Re: MI5 says "Kill Yourself"
Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media
References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<53eeev$cmg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:. Toronto Free-Net
Distribution:

iain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Iain L M Hotchkies) wrote:
>Indeed. If you've ever had a. 'conversation' with someone suffering
>from florid. schizophrenia, you'll know how difficult it can be to
>'argue'. with them.

I don't have florid symptoms. But I'm in. a difficult situation, because those
people who don't know, aren't. going to believe, and those who do, they just go
along with the crowd. It's never a. good idea to go against the grain, and the
grain here is defined by interests in the establishment and the. media. Even
people who could say out loud what. was happening won't, because then there's a
risk that they'll be seen. as traitors and ostracised.

Usually this type of 'hidden abuse'. is racial and targetted at a racial
minority within a country. You. keep the minorities out of the good jobs, but
you don't admit discrimination exists. It happens everywhere, not just. in
Britain. The persecution that is going on now is. in reality a refined form of
racism. Instead of "nigger" it's "nutter", and abusing the. mentally ill is
still socially acceptable today. In 50 years it might not be, but. today there
isn't any social or legal sanction against. it.

So. really they've refined racial harassment down to a minority of one. The
words may be. different, but the methods are the same.

3226