[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: bASS isms

Subject: Re: bASS isms
From: "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:01:41 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <%Otaj.20298$k27.14977@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.t3qmn7lckog9r0@dell> <vhebj.25431$eh4.20440@trnddc03> <wofbj.21841$k27.14220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <%MIbj.9634$DP1.1460@pd7urf2no> <VSObj.49642$L%6.35794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

RLB actually knowing something about the subject before offering an opinion
on it ? not very likely.

Doug
--

"sockozy" <pres@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VSObj.49642$L%6.35794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>I would take his advice with a grain of salt since he is not and cannot be
>licensed to do this kind of work and therefore does not and cannot legally
>monitor alarm systems.  After typing that last sentence one wonders why he
>would even opine on such subjects he is obviously out of the loop on?

References:
- bASS isms
  - From: sockozy
- Re: bASS isms
  - From: meesa
- Re: bASS isms
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: bASS isms
  - From: sockozy
- Re: bASS isms
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: bASS isms
  - From: sockozy

Prev by Message: Re: bASS isms
Next by Message: Re: bASS isms
Previous by thread: Re: bASS isms
Next by thread: Re: bASS isms
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home