[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas]

Subject: Re: 3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas]
From: Homer <dumpit@xxxx>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:15:33 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <47509af3$0$16517$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Jim Rojas wrote:

>Setting aside the specious nature of the motion itself the Court denies Defendant?s Motion

You can't seem to catch a break dude.  The court even threw a kinda
funny insult in with the denial. :-(

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas]
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Flush Mount
Next by Message: Re: Uplink Network/Line costs?
Previous by thread: Re: 3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas]
Next by thread: Re: 3:07cv0437 B, Brinks Home Security, Inc. v. Jim Rojas]
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home