[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: One For Nick

Subject: Re: One For Nick
From: "rabbid" <r@xxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:45:52 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <46c5b8a9$0$27734$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <h2nxi.39$4K6.0@trnddc02> <yIoxi.18036$aa7.6134@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <WTqxi.1473$ze.139@trnddc07>

"Nick Markowitz Jr." <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WTqxi.1473$ze.139@xxxxxxxxxxx
>I can bielieve it.
> Im sure some where in some code some where that would be illegal becuase
> you are giving a false impression that a fire alarm is installed.

or at worst sued by someone who thought there was a fire alarm when there
wasn't and got burned in a fire.

References:
- One For Nick
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: One For Nick
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: One For Nick
  - From: rabbid
- Re: One For Nick
  - From: Nick Markowitz Jr.

Prev by Message: Re: Takeover standards
Next by Message: Re: Takeover standards
Previous by thread: Re: One For Nick
Next by thread: Re: One For Nick
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home