Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

[JoeRaisin <joeraisin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert L Bass wrote:
>> You keep responding so I know you are out there.
>
>
> I've been accused of being "out there," yes.
>
>> I asked you to explain a comment you made and
>> so far you have avoided doing do.
>
>
> There's a difference between avoiding and not
> bothering.
>
>> In case you missed it I said:
>> "Please explain this to me.
>
>
> I thought it was obvious enough.
>
>>> Some people move alarm panels without
>>> telling the central station
>>
>>
>> If they do, the worst thing the CS can do is
>> send the cops to the old address.  I realize
>> this is confusing to you but try real hard and
>> perhaps it will become clear (or at least not
>> entirely blurry) to you."
>
>
> Let me try it again with emphgasis:  *If* the
> panel has been rel;ocated, *then* the worst
> thing the CS can do is send the police to the
> old address.
>
>> The only thing I can think of is that you
>> misunderstood the conversation.
>
>
> I understood the conversation.  The point is,
> if the panel is no longer at 499 Casino Ave,
> in Cranford but now resides at 91 Pine Ave
> in Garwood, the worst thing the central station
> can do is send the cops to Casino Ave.
>
> Do you disagree?

I would agree if the CS had been notified of the move.  In the example
we are discussing the CS had not been notified.

So you are telling me that if you owned a CS and an alarm came in from
one of your accounts which according to your records was located at 499
Casino Ave but the alarm came in with the wrong CID you would NOT dispatch?

The point is, if the sub moves the panel and doesn't tell you about it
how are you to know?  Especially if the alarm comes in before the next
scheduled test signal.