[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?

Subject: Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
From: "Nick Markowitz Jr." <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:24:19 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <tbmdnSkmwaIk_qzbnZ2dnUVZ_oavnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4631700a$0$17218$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <nxfYh.204743$ZA5.87950@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I have used the concord 4 panels for another contractor
found they work good  but wireless was not as good as i thought it should
have been  but it did perform as billed.
distance wise.

"Carl Carlson" <Carl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nxfYh.204743$ZA5.87950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Roland Moore wrote:
>
>>GE goal in its other product lines seems to be more
>> to being the best seller, not the best technically.
>
> Like ADT, Brinks, P1, etc.
> js
>

References:
- Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
  - From: Brance
- Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
  - From: Carl Carlson

Prev by Message: Re: Lying CUNT Kim Basinger: "I didn't leak Baldwin phone message"
Next by Message: Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
Previous by thread: Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
Next by thread: Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home