[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?

Subject: Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
From: "Carl Carlson" <Carl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:06:25 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <tbmdnSkmwaIk_qzbnZ2dnUVZ_oavnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4631700a$0$17218$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Roland Moore wrote:

>GE goal in its other product lines seems to be more
> to being the best seller, not the best technically.

Like ADT, Brinks, P1, etc.
js

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
  - From: Nick Markowitz Jr.

References:
- Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
  - From: Brance
- Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
  - From: Roland Moore

Prev by Message: Re: NOMINATION: Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" (Re: NOT GUILTY Re: Ping Lionel (was Re: NOMINATION: Michael Cranston for Bobo Award))
Next by Message: Re: Video Profiling
Previous by thread: Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
Next by thread: Re: Concord 4 Integrated + associated wireless gear == quality?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home