[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: NOMINATION: Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" (Re: NOT GUILTY Re: Ping Lionel (was Re: NOMINATION: Michael Cranston for Bobo Award))
"Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:so2ku.2k8.19.1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou island carrion. Thou hath
> more hair than wit, and more faults than hairs, and more wealth than
> faults. Ye announced:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:so23f.ku.19.1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> miguel <mjc101@xxxxxxxxx> Thou dumb innocent. Thou gnawing animal.
>>> Ye muddled:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:32:53 -0600, Art Deco <erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Art Deco" <erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:260420071440500821%erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>>>>> Was that supposed to be an insult?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you play chess?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did OJ Simpson slash his wife?
>>>>
>>>> Do you believe in America?
>>>> Do you believe in Justice?
>>>> Do you believe in the Constitution of the United States?
>>>> Do you believe in the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY?
>>>>
>>>> I do.
>>>>
>>>> The jury said it.
>>>> I believe it.
>>>> That settles it.
>>>>
>>>> NOT GUILTY.
>>>>
>>>> When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito Burrito
>>>> that OJ Simpson was "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," did the stupid
>>>> prosecutors listen? No, they didn't. They persecuted a 100% NOT
>>>> GUILTY man and kept him from hunting for the real killers.
>>>>
>>>> Now the trail has gone cold.
>>>>
>>>> So, Deco, you must believe in prosecuting the 100% NOT GUILTY
>>>> because you're some kind of idiot, huh?
>>>
>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very nice trigger. lmao - brilliant - Art asks a
>>> 6 word question and the frothing loon froths on command, as
>>> implicitly foretold with the recent words "Are you going to rant
>>> about OJ Simpson next", and as stated directly 14 days ago, by Art
>>> himself, 'Pssst -- crasston will defend OJ Simpson to his dying
>>> breath."
>>>
>>> For this worthy on cue frothing the likes of which I've only ever
>>> seen Pamela K Russell perform over Michael Jackson, I hereby
>>> nominate Michael "miguel" Cranston for the Barbara Woodhouse
>>> Memorial "Dog Whistle" k0oK Award, trained and owned by Art Deco.
>>>
>>> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial "Dog Whistle" Award
>>> Named in honour of the skilful dog-trainer who became a British TV
>>> personality in the 1980s, this award is given jointly to the best
>>> trained net.kook in any given month and to his or her trainer.
>>> Possible examples of good training include obedience to one's
>>> owner's commands to reply to posts, and devotion in following one's
>>> owner around from group to group and through the Google archive.
>>> House-training, which, regrettably, is a rare accomplishment for a
>>> kook, isn't a prerequisite. Woof.
>>>
>>> Do I hear seconds?
>>
>> For a cut and paste from an old troll?
>
> Since crasstoad is obviously that stupid, yes indeed.
Stupid?
Art's made several requests today; I would guess it seemed only polite
to comply:
Message-ID: <260420071104583690%erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <260420071441373640%erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <260420071532538178%erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cut 'n paste or
> no, Deco said crasstoad would do it, and crasstoad did do it.
No. He asked me once and he asked Mike twice.
> Anyway,
> you have no say in the matter so fuck right off and die.
Shoulda thought of that on the 23rd. ;)
The real question, I suppose is whether Mike can be trained by both
Bookman and Deco:
http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=cranston
I don't know the answer.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home