Re: Please tell the following to your buddies, Kurt.

[Lionel <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:54:43 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
<nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Lionel <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou blubbery notorious bawd. Thou
>cockeyed fathead. Ye snarled:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:30:21 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>> <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Art Deco <erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou bed-swerver. Thou speaks nothing
>>> but madman. Ye squealed:
>>>
>>>> The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics, T Wake
>>>>> <usenet.es7at@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote
>>>>> on Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:43:31 +0100
>>>>> <XYednSzcx8LOPLLbnZ2dnUVZ8qminZ2d@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Art Deco" <erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:250420070913481255%erfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> JeffSRelf <Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please tell the following to your buddies, Kurt,
>>>>>>>> and then report back to me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Although physical processes determine absolutely everything,
>>>>>>>> so that the future is just as fixed as the past,
>>>>>>>> time is a spatial dimension ( i.e. falsely directional ),
>>>>>>>> and we are 4-D rocks, static and immutable...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's impossible to imagine. Yet gravity is modeled that way.
>>>>>>>> In General Relativity, time is spatial.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All changes ( including choices ) are merely notional, not real.
>>>>>>>> Likewise, entropy is merely notional.  PseudoEntropy is our
>>>>>>>> PseudoGod. As God, PseudoEntropy creats, " uses " and then
>>>>>>>> destroys us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No underscores in this post, Jeff?  What's up with that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He got so excited at the chance to talk nonsense about time being
>>>>>> a spatial dimension, that he forgot his "signature" writing
>>>>>> style....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just love the way he abuses English...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't want to know how he abuses C++.... :-)
>>>>
>>>> I take it he's never read Stroustrup, Cline, and Meyers then?
>>>
>>> GitM is not correct about the Relf's C++ abuse. Abuse is not a
>>> suitable euphemism for any of capricious butchery, wanton rape or
>>> willful pillage.
>>
>> How do you tell the difference between that & any other kind of C++
>> code?
>
>Easy...
>
>Some Berserker code:
>
>public bool SelectGroup(string sGroup)
>{
> bool bZ;
> string[] sValues;
>
> bZ = _SendCommand("GROUP " + sGroup, NewsResponse.Server.GroupSelected);
>
> if (bZ == true)
> {
>   sValues = Split(m_sLastServerMessage);
>   m_ArticleCount = Val(sValues(1));
>   m_FirstArticle = Val(sValues(2));
>   m_LastArticle = Val(sValues(3));
> }
> else
> {
>   m_ArticleCount = 0;
>   m_FirstArticle = 0;
>   m_LastArticle = 0;
>   if (m_bUseExceptions == true) {
>     throw new NewsException(m_nLastServerCode, m_sLastServerMessage);
>   }
>
> if (Done != null)
> {
>   Done(NewsResponse.Method.SelectGroup, m_nLastServerCode,
>          m_sLastServerMessage);
> }
>
> return bZ;
>}
>
>
>The Relf Version of the same code:
>
>public bool SelectGroup(stringsGroup)
>
>{boolbZ;string[]sValues;bZ=_SendCommand("GROUP"+sGroup,NewsResponse.Server.GroupSelected);
>if(bZ==true){sValues=Split(m_sLastServerMessage);m_ArticleCount=Val(sValues(1));
>m_FirstArticle=Val(sValues(2));m_LastArticle=Val(sValues(3));}else{m_ArticleCount=0;
>m_FirstArticle=0;m_LastArticle=0;if(m_bUseExceptions==true)
>{thrownewNewsException(m_nLastServerCode,m_sLastServerMessage);
>}}if(Done!=null)
>{Done(NewsResponse.Method.SelectGroup,m_nLastServerCode,m_sLastServerMessage);
>}returnbZ;}

Yeah, the second chunk is more disgusting than the first, but only in
sense that sex with Porchy is more disgusting than sex with Porchy's
mom.
(Can you tell that I don't like C++?)

--
   W  "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them."
 . | ,. w ,
  \|/  \|/              Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------