Re: Psychology at work: How the Bunny-Boiler boils her bunnies - A must see event...

["Rhonda Lea Kirk" <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Lionel" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f0qco5$jv5$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:54:09 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snipped>

>> I have avoid
>
> Sweet, merciful lord - will this crap never cease?

<channeling> Are you an obsessed victim, Lionel? Do you have no control
over what and whom you reply to? </channeling>


<post-edit restored>

I have avoided nothing.

> As an aside that needs not be addressed, it is time to reassert that
> if there is even a shred of merit in what is being said here then your
> "five months of written evidence" are your ticket to some very serious
> trouble in relation to online stalking and harrassment, and perhaps
> even, depending on what you have told Michael Cranston et al in
> writing, libel.

I eagerly await receipt of my ticket.

> Given that, it is vital that you deal logically and unemotionally with
> each and every point that, when taken together, assert that a pattern
> does exist, despite your continued objections to the contrary.

No. It is not vital at all. See below.

> Considering that you appear to be in such an appalling position, you
> might consider if it is worthwhile asking your lawyer if a court may
> interpret written material in light of a clearly established pattern
> of behaviour.

My position is not at all appalling. And my pattern of behavior is
distinct, as is yours. The entire post linked below is enlightening, but
the relevant
part I wish to highlight is this, because it is what you have tried to
do above, and in innumerable posts throughout the last two and one-half
weeks:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/590b43a50041a715

"I like to destroy the context and create a new, entirely different
context, then force an opponent to acknowledge that they created the
context and therefore their view is incorrect."

In addition, the following post is also relevant:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.windows-xp/msg/18db311a40184c30

"I don't give a shit what you look like or what you are or who you are
in real life - this is usenet and it is far from real life. Essentially
that means I will continue to do what I have done for more than one and
a half decades on usenet...

Serve up copious amounts of bullshit to anyone willing to swallow it."

</restored post-edit>

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle