Re: Rhonda Bunny-Boiler explains why she's now threatening to out personal email to the police.

["Rhonda Lea Kirk" <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sjmuc.ltk.17.1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition <inquisition@xxxxxxxx> Thou
> botcher's apprentice. Thou little hangman. Ye harangued:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:44:25 +0545, Kadaitcha Man sat in thee Comfee
>> Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx> Thou breeder of sinners. Thou
>>> clay-brained guts. Ye fudged together:
>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx> Thou stigmatic. Thou hog
>>>>> cholera. Ye drooled:
>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote
>>>>>>> Nelson Muntz <none@xxxxxxxxx> Thou illiterate loiter. Thy
>>>>>>> complexion is like Swart, like my shoe, but thy face nothing
>>>>>>> like so clean kept, for
>>>>>>> why, ye sweats, a man may go over shoes in the grime of it. Ye
>>>>>>> hectored:
>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whilst it is true there is no winner, the court of public
>>>>>>>>> opinion has already spoken.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's just a sad situation all the way.  She clearly still has
>>>>>>>> feelings for you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bad luck for her. She should have thought about that before she
>>>>>>> started passing around her dirty knickers, thick with filthy
>>>>>>> lies and provably twisted distortions, in public on usenet and
>>>>>>> to goodness knows how many people in private, making veiled
>>>>>>> allusions and threats that later became direct accusations and
>>>>>>> actions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Love from a distance."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We<BITCHSLAP>
>>>>>
>>>>> No such entity exists.
>>>>
>>>> Sure it does.
>>>>
>>>> Just because one knows that a relationship can't be fixed, doesn't
>>>> mean that love evaporates.
>>>
>>> Emotional manipulation.
>>>
>>>> But you mentioned in a different post that survival instinct trumps
>>>> principle. It's odd that you would call the police because you
>>>> decided to interpret the same long-repeated words to mean I was an
>>>> imminent suicide, and yet you fail to understand that extricating
>>>> myself from you is a survival issue for me.
>>>
>>> Diversion, emotional manipulation and fact denial.
>>>
>>>> It would be easy if I didn't care, but I do, so it's hard.
>>>>
>>>> The thing is, having gone so many rounds since October, there was
>>>> no doubt in my mind that there would be something more after
>>>> February
>>>> 1. And there was.
>>>
>>> Self-justification dressed up to hide veiled accusations.
>>>
>>>> I can handle this. I can't handle another round of what we were
>>>> doing all that time.
>>>
>>> Dowager drama queen act.
>>>
>>> Rhonda, nobody but you seems to believe your spin and lies any more.
>>> You sit alone with your self-deceptions and self-justifications to
>>> keep you in your own miserable company. Not even your knight in
>>> shining tinfoil, crasston, is defending you anymore against the
>>> charges being repeatedly laid against you. All he can do is throw
>>> pathetic lames around and talk about himself. His silence on
>>> everything except himself is both deafening and telling.
>>>
>>> You need to get help and you need to uninstall hamster, cancel your
>>> news services and get the fuck offline.
>>
>> Rhonda: "You can't bully me off usenet!!!" If it's so hard for her to
>> extricate herself from you, the simplest solution would be to get off
>> of usenet.
>
> I have now twice indicated the following to her:

And I have many more times invited you to call the Australian Federal
Police, as you threatened, or to take any other action you should
choose.

> [QUOTE]
> If the underlying idea in the post linked to below has an accurate
> basis that exposes the psychology of what is actually in the emails
> you want posted: news:sjijh.62o.17.1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Then your "five months of written evidence" are your ticket to a jail
> spell for online stalking and harassment.
>
> Talk it over with your attorney.
>
> *hint* *hint*
> [/QUOTE]
>
> Consequently I'm now bowing out of these threads

Again.

> and this whole
> discussion in its entirely.

Again.

> I am certain that Michael Cranston
> attorney will want to explain to Rhonda why I might be doing such a
> thing.

rofl!

> I also hope he has the brains to realise that if the above has
> even a shred of merit then this:
>
> news:f0lpup$o1m$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ...may put him firmly in possession of libel and he would do well not
> to empty his mailbox and chat histories.

My poor tummy.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle