Group-snecking Coward Alert (Re: Rhonda Lea Kirk tells the world that it's completely ethical to post private email to get back at an ex.)

["Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx>]

Rhonda Lea Kirk <spunky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou salt-water thief. Thou
bloodsucking, muddle-mettled weasel. Ye yammered:

> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:sh4vs.vso.19.1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Lionel <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou sad fool. Thou base ignoble
>> wretch. Ye squirted:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:59:10 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx> Thou crook-pated drayman.
>>>> Thou idle-headed motion generative. Ye hiccupped:
>>>>
>>>>> "Lionel" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:f0jn78$6um$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:01:58 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>> <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:sg7g3.3fl.19.1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Lionel <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou drunk hooknose. Thou
>>>>>>>> waxy-faced prodigal. Ye stage-whispered:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She also fails to mention that the incident occurred some 12
>>>>>>>>> years ago, & that my sole connection to it is that one of the
>>>>>>>>> participants is a friend of mine who I know from another part
>>>>>>>>> of Usenet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That very same Svengali trick is perpetrated everywhere in her
>>>>>>>> bullshit, Lionel. Only a fucking certifiable nutjob takes the
>>>>>>>> distant past, admits to negatively bending the facts then
>>>>>>>> asserts the altered "fact" as a present fact or as a fact
>>>>>>>> (twisted as it is) that should somehow be believed as
>>>>>>>> supporting their fucked up grip on reality in the present.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact is that you groped me in a public place in front of a
>>>>>>> man we'd only just met.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My perception of that fact changed when you continued to show a
>>>>>>> total disregard for my health, safety and welfare.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She admitted in her own words that she applies a negative focus
>>>>>>>> to facts. And in the very next mind-pretzel that she created
>>>>>>>> she blamed me for the whole fucking lot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't grope myself, Rick. I didn't invite you to grope me,
>>>>>>> and I never gave you any reason to believe it would be okay to
>>>>>>> blatantly grab my breast in front of another person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It utterly amazes me that you think that anyone on Usenet
>>>>>> actually gives a shit what you two did in real life, Bunny
>>>>>> Boiler. Especially as a witness has confirmed that you seemed to
>>>>>> think it was pretty funny at the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I seem to have missed that post. Got a link?
>>>>>
>>>>> But in response to your supposition, after the initial shock, I
>>>>> made a joke of it. There's more here, however:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/msg/39b5a76b973972eb?hl=en&;
>>>>>
>>>>> My joy is overwhelming, as you can see for yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone other than you will note that your then allegedly
>>>> underwhelming joy is not equitable with the nefarious act upon your
>>>> person and upon your dignity that you later transmogrified it into,
>>>> you fuckheaded psycho bitch.
>>>>
>>>> And that, bunny-boiler, is the precise point you've been beaten up
>>>> for in every single post you've made. The fact is, anyone who sees
>>>> the text at that link and who also saw your later claims about the
>>>> awful nature of the horrible crime perpetrated upon you will see
>>>> the entire span of the lie that you have spun.
>>>>
>>>> However you are so far gone in the loony department that you
>>>> persistently fail to see that that is the very point that's been
>>>> driven into your delusional skull time and time again. Even after
>>>> you explicitly stated twice that you revised history by way of your
>>>> insanely altered perceptions.
>>>
>>> Mate, the point you're missing is that the loony bitch *thinks it's
>>> perfectly okay* to change history to suit her mood of the moment.
>>
>> Oh, yes, I know that...
>>
>>> This isn't just hyperbole on my part - cloaked though it was in
>>> psychobabble, she's *explicitly stated* that she 'thinks' that way.
>>
>> I fully agree, she's thinks it is perfectly ok to revise history
>> merely by altering her perceptions in the present. And, like you, no
>> hyperbole on my part either, that is some seriosuly fucked up
>> behaviour.
>
> The history is in the posts, and before that, in the emails, read
> chronologically. My change in perception of the intent of your earlier
> actions is the result of your later actions, which actions
> established a pattern of clear disregard for my welfare.

Real meaning: You changed history to suit yourself.

> So why don't you go ahead and make good on your threat to go to the
> Australian Federal Police and prove to me that I'm wrong?
>
> I would welcome it.

That troll was pulled out from under you so long ago that it is truly
pathetic to see you witlessly persisting in your attempts to squeeze yet
more mileage out of it, you group-snecking coward.

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
    Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
    Usenet Ruiner Lits
    Top Assholes on the Net Lits
    Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een doorgedraaide geslingerde zweetanus.