Re: NOMINATION: Dark Angel for Salinger HLS was Re: Loonel has a gerbil up his as$ right now

["Kadaitcha Man" <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thou hilding of a devilish spirit. Thou counterfeit to thy true friend.
Ye cawed:

> DaRkAnGeL wrote:
>> On 2007-04-23 18:26:41 -0500, Kali <kali@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>>
>>> In <f0gfot$h19$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, DaRkAnGeL
>>> chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
>>>> On 2007-04-22 15:04:26 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>> <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>
>>>>> "DaRkAnGeL" <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:f0gdp1$d7f$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> On 2007-04-22 01:48:50 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>> <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>>>> "Lionel" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:f0ev74$fr6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:00:31 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>>> <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:f0epsd$29q$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:00:40 -0500, DaRkAnGeL
>>>>>>>>>> <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2007-04-21 15:02:25 -0500, miguel <mjc101@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:59:32 -0500, DaRkAnGeL
>>>>>>>>>>>> <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2007-04-20 02:25:52 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DaRkAnGeL <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou puisny tilter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thou vagabond. Ye commented:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2007-04-20 01:06:21 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DaRkAnGeL <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou flinty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tartar. Thou faithless coward. Ye hummed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2007-04-19 21:35:23 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DaRkAnGeL <chaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou pilchard.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As goodness is poison to your stomach. Ye discoursed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2007-04-19 06:41:48 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The NYC Kid <OGnigga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> floor-licking foolish extravagant spirit. Thou
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witless holiday fool. Ye retched:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lionel <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thou sot. We need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no grave to bury honesty, there's not a grain of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it the face to sweeten of the whole dungy earth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ye chafed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:14:06 -0500, DaRkAnGeL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chaos@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2007-04-17 03:17:52 -0500, Lionel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, but I think the odds are against it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say "attractive, intelligent AND
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well-endowed" love. I've known of many a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid man with an impressive member.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heh. Reminds me of a funny article I read many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago in some adult magazine by a woman who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'surveyed' a bunch of well-endowed men. IIRC,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> her
>>> conclusion was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that gift had been wasted on most of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <waves hello>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <my mate waves in return>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <grin>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a woman named Rhonda Lea Kirk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stalking her ex right here in AUK, &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exhibiting classic
>>> lack of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insight & projection. She seems likely to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blow a fuse any day now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a pity.  :^(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps she's not settled herself to the loss?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've seen love do particularly terrible things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to good people. Hopefully, this phase will not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last. :^( And I do hope that you and your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mates are being kind to her. Dare I hope?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, we tried hard to ignore the whole thing,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but unfortunately, she was determined to turn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the whole thing into a huge soap opera to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back at her ex. :^|
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are any number of (presumably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schizophrenic) science kooks crossposting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into AUK, but with whom I'm not terribly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> familiar, as that style of kookyness doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest me greatly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many of the sciences are of no interest to me,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either. I prefer the human sciences. :^)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm interested in both, but I have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prioritise my interests pretty heavily,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have always fascinated me, even as a
>>> tot. Why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they do what they do.  While one person loses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their job, their spouse, suffers an illness,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc, and decides to punish the world or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> innocent strangers for it; and another how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experiences the same disheartening issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merely takes it in stride and moves on. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> essence, it's why I became what I became. :^/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nods> I've always been interested in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> psychology for similar reasons, & learned a lot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more when I was living for several years with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partner who was working on a degree in psych
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for most of the
>>> time we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were together. After helping her interpret her
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> textbooks & with her assignments, I was very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suprised at how much knowledge I'd picked up on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the formal subject over the years. If I wanted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to pick up the basic degree, it wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that much of a struggle, at least
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intellectually. In the last year of her degree,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she was being offered a post in forensic psych,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is an area I'd also find very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting. [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you have a good sense of humour, so as
>>> long as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you keep your mask on, & your knickers up, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be reasonably safe in both AHM & AUK.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My mask? I'm not sure what you mean .... is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this something that my mate should have warned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me about? :^)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your posting ID & email address.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which, BTW, you need to fix, because foad.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a real domain, & unless you have an account
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there, or permission from the owners, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't be
>>> using it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in your posts. If you change it to (for example)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'chaos@xxxxxxxxx' then it'll be legal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alternatively, you could open a free email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> account & use that, or ask some nice person who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owns a bunch of domains (such as myself!) to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give you a real email address at one of their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> domains, & use that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think he may have left a few things out in my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short education about usenet. :^)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, he seems to have covered the basics,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because your mask seems to firmly glued on, &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your knickers are covering everything you'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably want them to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan to change that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hellz yeah.  Strip that bitch.  Lets look at that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bootie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Metaphorically speaking, that is the objective,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the bootie I'm interested in is not the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bootie you're interested in. Nevertheless we (you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I, and disinterested passers-by) may get to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see both.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps Lionel, the dear Rev might be able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accomplish that - but you, love? Hardly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even Porchy is far better qualified than you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The allusion escaped you, didn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did the reality escape you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm assuming that you're addressing both types of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "bootie" my arse - the figurative and literal?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The bootie he wants is your arse. The bootie I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after is your psyche. Yes, I assumed that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that's the case, I addressed both instances.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then noob as I am, the statement went over my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I saw your hair fly up as it passed over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You couldn't have ... I'm bald. Shiny as an egg. love.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cancer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm bald. Shiny as an egg, love. Razor blade.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joking aside, I hope the prognosis is good and that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have lots of support. I'm genuinely sorry to hear you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unwell.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now I feel absolutely terrible, knowing that I've crossed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a horrible line and hurt those that are dear ... I was
>>> making up
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit and I didn't stop to think about others and how
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they've been affected by cancer (though I did have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> benign tumour that was successfully excised about four
>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago - but even still, that's no excuse).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you and Lionel in the face of my horrible
>>>>>>>>>>>>> joke, are being so kind is even worse ... I really didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean to make so light of something so horrid. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially, in light of my horrible joke, I don't deserve
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your kind wishes or words. I really hope you can accept
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my apologies ... and if not, I completely understand. But
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am deeply and truly sorry. :^(
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For a truly excellent troll, I nominate Dark Angel for a
>>>>>>>>>>>> Salinger. Seconds?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if I'm allowed to, but I most respectfully
>>>>>>>>>>> decline the nomination. It was a horrible joke (even though
>>>>>>>>>>> a half-truth) ... and I, even if
>>>>>>>>>>> this nomination were genuine, couldn't accept it in all
>>>>>>>>>>> fairness.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cranston is totally incapable of telling the difference
>>> between a
>>>>>>>>>> mistake & a deliberate attempt to deceive, which is one of
>>>>>>>>>> the many characteristics that make him a net-kook, & thus
>>>>>>>>>> disqualified from nominating anybody for anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <choking>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Got Cranston's cock stuck in your throat, Honey?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm in New Jersey. He's in Washington State. If his cock is that
>>>>>>> long, perhaps you should think twice about harassing him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I daresay, if his cock is that long, I wonder why the bloody
>>>>>> hell he's spending so much time on usenet!
>>>>>> I couldn't help it ... your visual was far too tempting. :^)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm staying away so as not to taint you, my dear,
>>>>
>>>> Please don't stay away ... I do love talking to you.
>>>> I really only wish that all three of you could find a way to purge
>>>> this disagreement and go back to being mates. You're all so dear
>>>> to me ...
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>>> I'd just love to see you all happy.
>>>> But most of all, I heartily wish your love story had a famously
>>>> happy ending. I can truly hear the remembrance of love past in
>>>> yours and his posts ... I can see that there was a fierce,
>>>> passionate love there :^( I don't mean to dredge up horrid
>>>> memories - or to get in the way of your sorting things out ... it
>>>> just seems so ... sad. You all are such dear people.
>>>>
>>>>> but I do find your
>>>>> posts most enjoyable. :)
>>>>
>>>> As I most certainly do yours, love. :^)
>>>
>>> Feel the love. lol
>>>
>>> Kali
>>
>>
>> Kali (and *only* Kali),
>> Aren't you mates with all three? How are you dealing with this?
>> Watching people you care about hurting each other?
>>
>> I'm sure you'll answer with a pragmatic "it is what it is" .... but I
>> just can't understand how to adopt that stance in this situation ...
>>
>> Between you and I (though I know it's not really so) ... I can hear
>> how deeply they cared for each other. Isn't that exactly how it was?
>> Wasn't there, in your view, *real* love and passion there?
>>
>> Call me naive, but at the end of the day, it should *mean* something.
>> Perhaps, and again, I'm sure I'm being naive, but if they could get
>> past this issue (obviously, with me not knowing everything about the
>> issue that started all of this), perhaps they could forgive each
>> other??? There was one post I read a few days past and the concise
>> version of
>> it went like this:
>>
>> Rhonda: Fuck you, I loved YOU!!
>> Kadaitcha: Fuck you, I loved YOU!!
>>
>> I have to admit, it's like the classic Romeo and Juliet ... instead
>> of killing themselves for each other, they're killing themselves
>> *over* each other. And trying to take the other out with them.
>>
>> And stupid as I may very well be, I'm still hoping for a happy
>> ending. I'm hoping for one of them to break the other's boundaries
>> and have the other realise what they're giving up.
>>
>> Also, and again, I may be stupid, but neither of them seem to be the
>> sort that would keep on if they truly were that disgusted with each
>> other (granted, I don't know them as you do) ... they seem more the
>> type that would say "Bugger it!" and throw their hands in the air,
>> refusing to type anymore ... but they seem to keep finding the
>> wherewithal to continue posting to each other - even if it's only in
>> anger. Somewhere, there *is* something deeper than mere anger and
>> more compelling than hate ...
>>
>> Or am I the only one who thinks so?? Am I the only one who really
>> thinks that if you lock these two in a room together, they may come
>> out lovers again??
>
> IF you do lock them in a room, please let me know.  I wanna blow that
> fucking room to hell and back.
>
> This soap opera is shite.  A bunch of a panzy ass goatblowers bearing
> their souls in Usenet like this is some kind of fucking psychologist's
> office.  This is Usenet, not some emotional fucking hotline.
>
> The entire mess is a candidate for "Biggest Bullshit Tear-Jerker of
> the Year" award with Best Whiny Cunt going to Rhonda and Best
> Supporting Asshat going to KM.  Lionel gets honourable mention for
> Best Director -- since everybody knows he brilliantly steered these
> two asshats into this fucking trainwreck.
>
> Fuckheads, the whole lot.

LMAO - it's a fucking pisser, innit, hey?

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
    Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
    Usenet Ruiner Lits
    Top Assholes on the Net Lits
    Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits

"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Jij kutloze banale klompenkut.