Re: Rhonda Bunny-Boiler explains why she's now threatening to out personal email to the police.

["Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Nelson Muntz" <none@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:m6il235uj7kassbqi8irvv2rbi4ndm0ufl@xxxxxxx
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>> You know, despite what has happened in that regard, credit must be
>> given where credit is due. Rhonda is far from stupid, very
>> articulate and very clever; she also has some very firm principles
>> that must be respected. I don't suppose it has crossed whatever it
>> is you are pleased to palm off to unsuspecting passers-by as your
>> mind that she may find it exceedingly disagreeable that you are
>> trying to make contact with her in private all the while using those
>> recent events as a public leverage point for getting your last
>> terrible beating at my hands off your chest at her expense.
>
> Please re-examine grammar 101.  That run-on is unreadable.

Let me help.

Having absolutely nothing to do with whatever has passed here
recently--between Rick and me and anyone else who was involved--you did
something several years ago that, on its face, was simply wrong. You
were rightfully nailed for doing that wrong thing at the time you did
it. Now you're attempting to use /me/ as a club to beat Rick about the
head, as if what is happening /now/ can somehow turn back the clock and
make what you did /then/ right.

It wasn't right. It isn't right. It will never be right. Even if Rick
and I meet in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and tear each other to
bloody pieces, it still won't be right.

To make it perfectly clear, it wouldn't matter who it was you had the
unfortunate encounter with back then--even if it were my worst
enemy--because it would still be wrong.

>> In other words, you would do wise to shut the fuck up on that score.
>> Alas for you, yet hopefully, Rhonda may have already taken very good
>> note of your obvious netK0okery and may have decided it is wise to
>> avoid you at all costs, Mister Tasycakes Man.
>
> On this note, I think you are right.  When someone gets involved in a
> internal dispute, the loser always is the interferer.  Proof is here:
> Message-ID: f0edip$1vl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Just so we're clear, this has nothing to do with getting involved in an
internal dispute.

Instead, it has to do with the wrongness of using that internal dispute
for your own purpose, most especially when that purpose was to further
compound a wrong you had done previously.

> I will now gracefully bow out, and leave you two to tear each other
> up.  Good luck.  I wish you both the best.

Thanks.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

You can discover what your enemy fears most by
observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer