Re: wired vs wireless ? nevermind

["- Bobb -" <bobb@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, I had checked in my newsreader (OE) and it didn't go back years
so didn't find a recent answer : just lots of dated "he said" /"she
said". I thought perhaps it had  been resolved by now. I checked google
as you said and only found what looked like ongoing battles ending in
statements like:

"Take 2 more little yellow pills and send me 5 bucks in the morning you
moron. "

So I guess I'll go wired - thanks.


"Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qAESg.13495$v%4.3227@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "G. Morgan" <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3imlh29ge5dvi65aapdauitfstjt1nobg1@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:11:11 -0400, "- Bobb -" <bobb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>How about wired vs wireless ?
>>>Wouldn't wireless be subject to jamming / interference ?
>>>Opinions either way - Good points vs bad ?
>>
>>
>> Google this group for "wired vs wireless" and "wireless jamming
>> interference".  You'll quickly see the horse has been thoroughly
>> beaten.
>>
>>
> you just can't kill it... it keeps coming back like Freddie Krugger
> :-))
>> --
>>
>> -Graham
>> (remove the double e's to email)
>
>