[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question of the Week: (mandatory participaction or you you be castrated!)
man ain't that the dumbest commerical? and their hemaroid one is even worse!
this country is getting dumma and dumma
"rqo" <safetyo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:I2TRg.37128$KR1.3397@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| My XM radio listening experience has slowly gotten worse. It's.........
| <static sound>
| Head-On....apply directly to the forehead
| Head-On....apply directly to the forehead
| Head-On....apply directly to the forehead
| <static sound>
| What was I going to say? I don't remember now....
|
|
| rqo
|
|
| "Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:dnSRg.22948$eW5.8284@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Now we can pay for "radio" (XM & Sirius) and still have the pleasure
| > of listening to commercials. Are we gullable or what?
| >
| > And, Yes! I remember when "cable" was commercial free.
| >
| > Norm Mugford
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:4517ebc6$0$25773$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >> All I watch is commercials, so the channel never matters to me and
| >> there's
| >> loads of commerical content everywhere.
| >>
| >> HEY....remember the days when we PAID for cable because there were NO
| >> commercials...whatever happened? They snuck one by us didn't they?!!
Now
| >> we
| >> pay to watch commercials.
| >>
| >>
| >> "G. Morgan" <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >> news:mq0ch2969rj4jgfh0b6n3vjgkc7bki1cq5@xxxxxxxxxx
| >> | If you could receive *one*, and one only TV channel, what would it
| >> | be -- and why?
| >> |
| >> |
| >> | --
| >> |
| >> | -Graham
| >> | (remove the double e's to email)
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
| > I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
| > http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
| >
|
|
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home