Re: Question of the Week: (mandatory participaction or you you be castrated!)

["rqo" <safetyo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My XM radio listening experience has slowly gotten worse.  It's.........
<static sound>
Head-On....apply directly to the forehead
Head-On....apply directly to the forehead
Head-On....apply directly to the forehead
<static sound>
What was I going to say?  I don't remember now....


rqo


"Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dnSRg.22948$eW5.8284@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Now we can pay for "radio" (XM & Sirius) and still have the pleasure
> of listening to commercials. Are we gullable or what?
>
> And, Yes! I remember when "cable" was commercial free.
>
> Norm Mugford
>
>
>
>
> "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4517ebc6$0$25773$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> All I watch is commercials, so the channel never matters to me and
>> there's
>> loads of commerical content everywhere.
>>
>> HEY....remember the days when we PAID for cable because there were NO
>> commercials...whatever happened? They snuck one by us didn't they?!! Now
>> we
>> pay to watch commercials.
>>
>>
>> "G. Morgan" <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:mq0ch2969rj4jgfh0b6n3vjgkc7bki1cq5@xxxxxxxxxx
>> | If you could receive *one*,  and one only  TV channel, what would it
>> | be -- and why?
>> |
>> |
>> | --
>> |
>> | -Graham
>> | (remove the double e's to email)
>>
>>
>
>
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>