[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com

Subject: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
From: Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:29:27 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <jKU0h.22068$GN5.11343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d31h.14899$DH5.2174@trnddc04> <wqidnVvDrIIqD9vYnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Mark Leuck wrote:

> And I am tired of those who think this is why when it's not, THE REASON it
> is done is to streamline the installation process and prevent incorrect
> programming. When you are a company the size of Brinks and you don't do that
> you end up with 5,000 different ways to program the same panel. Few
> installers do it correctly

Man...  Workin' for ADT must be a nightmare then.  How many times have
they changed manufacturer's in the last couple of years??

References:
- PR: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: Tag line
Next by Message: Re: SST
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Next by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home