[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PR: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com

Subject: Re: PR: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
From: G. Morgan <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:57:00 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <jKU0h.22068$GN5.11343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <TuV0h.214452$R63.97880@pd7urf1no>

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:46:59 GMT, Frank Olson
<Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>I wanna know how you responded to each of these letters.  I suppose that
>because Black and Decker owns the patent on their drills, I should be
>shipping back the ones that don't work anymore...

Frank....

And everyone.

These banters are subject to his case.

Think before you write.

Jim....

~You better tell that herd what to do~

--

-Graham
(remove the double e's to email)

References:
- PR: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: PR: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: Press "1" for English
Next by Message: Re: Suggestion for box where alarm monitoring failovers from landline to cell phone - when landline is cut.
Previous by thread: Re: PR: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Next by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home