[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Baghdad security plan 'failing'

Subject: Re: Baghdad security plan 'failing'
From: G. Morgan <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:27:46 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <7dSdnUiWzcGk06XYnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <6ikgj21e2ris57mn9cqcqsfm644nipq4vi@xxxxxxx> <Dz4_g.21828$7I1.19095@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:55:47 GMT, "Allan Waghalter"
<awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>We don't need to see this stuff twice.  If you want to cross post to home
>automation, I can't begin to imagine why, just post there without sending it
>back to this group for a second time.

I think Doug said it best in his reply.

>PS:  Are you going to the Bass (Not related to RLB) Courtesy Day here at
>noon?  If so, give me a call and we can meet up.

Nahh, I just got back from a busy day of service.  First one was BE
THERE @ 8:15 and don't be late, or course they stood me up.

The second one was scheduled for 10:00, the guy shows up @ 11:00.

--

-Graham
(remove the double e's to email)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Baghdad security plan 'failing'
  - From: Crash Gordon

References:
- Baghdad security plan 'failing'
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Baghdad security plan 'failing'
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: Baghdad security plan 'failing'
  - From: Allan Waghalter

Prev by Message: Re: Suggestion for box where alarm monitoring failovers from landline to cell phone - when landline is cut.
Next by Message: Seasonality in the security business?
Previous by thread: Re: Baghdad security plan 'failing'
Next by thread: Re: Baghdad security plan 'failing'
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home