Re: For Roland Moore

["Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

Robert L Bass wrote:
> > No he specifically blames you
>
> No, *you* specifically blame me, but you've never been honest.  I've met Steve in person and the conversation was quite civil.  You
> won't admit it but he left during the first trash-talk tirade from Sabodish.  Numerous others have left because of Jiminex.

And that's exactly what is going to continue to happen as long as
you're .....   wellllll I guess I can say, as long as you're
alive. Which isn't such a long time now ............... is it? Aint it
a bitch?   You wont stop being disruptive and I'll keep chasing
people away.   It's just payback for all the nasty things you've done
all your abhorent life.

> Most
> sane people in the trade left long ago due to *all* of the noise in ASA.  The only ones who stayed around are Bob C, Bob L, me and
> the IB (that includes you).
>
> You've openly stated several times that you enjoy all the fighting that goes on in ASA and you've made it a point to provoke strife
> on a regular basis  so your disingenuous claim that I've driven SR out is just BS.
>
> --
Your memory is getting shorter than your life.

You seem to have forgotten the below post that Steve made just before
he stopped posting in ASA

> I would have expected no less from you Robert.
> It is true this is an "alt" group, along with tens of thousands other
> groups.  Being an "alt" group does not mean the group is open to the whim
> of anyone whose whim warrants it.


> You and I have had many conversations over the last couple of years and I
> can understand where you are coming from.  I can also understand that you
> are the prime reason for many of the problems.  You may not provoke it
> intentionally but the utter hatred for you that many in the group have is
> the reason I'm having to do this in the first place.


> I've tried to be patient with you, I've tried to explain the way things
> should/could work but your goals are always ahead of the group in
> general.


> Any newsgroup can take control of it's own destiny, there is no rule that
> says all alt groups must be total chaos.  The "big 8" were created first,
> then the .alt groups so there could be more laxx areas.  The "alt"
> hierarchy wasn't formed with the intent that all groups in it be totally
> out of control.  At the time the alt hierarchy was created, spam was not
> a problem and most users of the newsgroups at all were people like myself
> who had been involved in it for many years who exhibited some restraint
> in our on-line activities on our own.


> Read the FAQ Robert.  You've hidden behind it yourself, you have used it
> to retaliate against those you felt should be "moderated" (do I have to
> quote some of your emails to me asking for others to be moderated), yet
> when it doesn't turn your way all of a sudden the whole concept is wrong.
> I am not the "moderator" of the group, no one is.  There is no official
> procedure for changing the FAQ of the group other than it is the
> responsibility of the Group Host to maintain it as the FAQ states.


> If you have suggestions for changes to the FAQ to be made, then by all
> means stop criticizing everyone else and make some useful suggestions.
> These are being run on a "trial" basis for one week as I stated.  If it
> doesn't work out then we'll change them.  Or if someone has a better idea
> before that, we can change it.  These aren't set in stone, they are my
> suggestions for improving the group.


> Grow up Robert and either participate nicely or go play somewhere else.


> --
> --
> Steven M. Ryckman, asa Group Host

You've burned all the bridges that are necessary to show anyone what a
liar you are.

YOU are the reason this Newsgroup is in chaos and I can prove it any
time
by simply showing the record of your long history of vile behavior in
Usenet.