[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com

Subject: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:41:06 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <jKU0h.22068$GN5.11343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d31h.14899$DH5.2174@trnddc04> <wqidnVvDrIIqD9vYnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <HoV1h.231287$1T2.104771@pd7urf2no> <1162369386.430334.231630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <L9OdnZGdStU-x9XYnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1162407588.184264.245480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1162407588.184264.245480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Mark Leuck wrote:
> > "Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1162369386.430334.231630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > ADT allowed Ademco, DSC, Moose, and ITI.
> > > I don't know of a brand that Monitronics ever said no to. I'd bet they
> > > even monitor the Loxxon.
> >
> > Only because you installed it <
>
> And when I called you for tech support tell me you didn't say "funny
> you're calling about the Loxxon I have the new version on my desk it's
> a pretty cool little panel but I prefer the Smoke Cannon"
> Shame the devil and tell the truth

Oh thanks Tom, I had signed an NDA on that new Loxxon and you just blew it

References:
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Everywhere Man
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
  - From: Everywhere Man

Prev by Message: Re: Beware of those pills Robert Bass
Next by Message: Re: Let's say I break into your house 9, was: Good news for US -- Secure Fence Act of 2006
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Next by thread: Re: Brinks vs. Tech-man.com
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home