[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star

Subject: Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
From: J. Sloud <jsloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:04:09 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <Mr34g.1704$1V4.138545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cqr252dkeivulnma7mcqbb1uo145uvq2fs@xxxxxxx> <44516956$0$14483$6d36acad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <v4o5g.447$VV2.35490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7jif52lbs3ni5kf9h6s9bakenttiaaulcf@xxxxxxx> <JkW5g.109108$P01.8553@pd7tw3no> <%P16g.1379$VV2.101585@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5876g.113587$P01.107765@pd7tw3no>

On Wed, 03 May 2006 19:03:29 GMT, Matt Ion <soundy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>If, after presenting the info and benefits listed here, he's still
>opposed to the idea, you might try asking his SPECIFIC issues with
>wireless, then do a little research into those issues to either confirm
>or allay his fears...
>

Or you can post his concerns here.  Some of us have probably dealt
with them before.
--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

References:
- Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
  - From: Pat Coghlan
- Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
  - From: J . Sloud
- Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
  - From: Matt Ion
- Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
  - From: Pat Coghlan
- Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
  - From: Matt Ion

Prev by Message: Re: Installalation Tips and Tools
Next by Message: Everything must go
Previous by thread: Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
Next by thread: Re: IP cameras on ring topology, not star
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home