[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Take Over Practices



spankling is the less sexist form of spanking
but it still hurts

"mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:445559ed$0$14481$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> hahahahahahaha, don't go getting your balls all tied in a knot, Bob....
> scan down...
> you said HIS equipment and Doug caught you fair and sqaure.
> So bend over, brace yourself against that wall and take your spankling
like
> a man.
>
> "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:qw85g.182$VV2.16678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > How so ? I don't see anything in it relating to gender which might make
it
> > "sexist". I figured it would get some people going based on the content,
> but
> > never based on it being a "sexist" remark.
> >
> > Maybe I'm too "old school" to understand; maybe you young guys could
> explain
> > how its sexist....
> >
> > RHC
> >
> > "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:4454f25f$0$14454$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Yep, I concur... it was a sexist post, Bob.
> > >
> > > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:nf25g.41$ix6.8806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Sexist ???!!! I've been called a lot of things, but never sexist
> before.
> > > But
> > >> you're right, if the equipment is leased, they can do what they want
> with
> > >> it. I understood (it seems incorrectly) that Brinks sold their
> > >> hardware...
> > >>
> > >> But sexist.....???
> > >>
> > >> RHC
> > >>
> > >> "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > >> news:ibX4g.15296$Qz.1732@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> >I find your rant somewhat sexist, but leaving that aside I didn't
> think
> > >> >that Brinks actually sold their proprietary panels, I was under the
> > >> >impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining
> > >> >ownership
> > >> >in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control and
> > > freedom
> > >> >of choice of their equipment at the end of the term without having
to
> > > worry
> > >> >about the bottom feeders stealing their equipment for their own use.
> > >> >
> > >> > Doug L
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > >> > news:uAW4g.2873$1V4.226223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> >> Rant "ON"..
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Where the hell are the discussions and concerns about the
customers
> > >> >> rights in all this !! What right does Brinks have to sell a
> > >> >> proprietary
> > >> >> panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete
control
> > > and
> > >> >> freedom of choice over HIS equipment at the end of the term ?
> > >> >> Answer...they don't !!
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
> >
> >
>
>
> *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home