Re: Take Over Practices

["Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>]

OK I'll argue with you. What would you like to argue about? Contracts?
Lockout codes? Gun-control? The grassy knoll? Loxxon?




R.H.Campbell wrote:
> Ok, I see. In my day, HIS meant both genders; however, it seems things are
> interpreted differently these days....you know. like the Royal we....
>
> Damn ! I thought that post would stir up more indignation than that ! I
> guess they got me figured out by now....
>
> RHC
>
> "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:445559ed$0$14481$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > hahahahahahaha, don't go getting your balls all tied in a knot, Bob....
> > scan down...
> > you said HIS equipment and Doug caught you fair and sqaure.
> > So bend over, brace yourself against that wall and take your spankling
> > like
> > a man.
> >
> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:qw85g.182$VV2.16678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> How so ? I don't see anything in it relating to gender which might make
> >> it
> >> "sexist". I figured it would get some people going based on the content,
> > but
> >> never based on it being a "sexist" remark.
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm too "old school" to understand; maybe you young guys could
> > explain
> >> how its sexist....
> >>
> >> RHC
> >>
> >> "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:4454f25f$0$14454$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Yep, I concur... it was a sexist post, Bob.
> >> >
> >> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:nf25g.41$ix6.8806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Sexist ???!!! I've been called a lot of things, but never sexist
> > before.
> >> > But
> >> >> you're right, if the equipment is leased, they can do what they want
> > with
> >> >> it. I understood (it seems incorrectly) that Brinks sold their
> >> >> hardware...
> >> >>
> >> >> But sexist.....???
> >> >>
> >> >> RHC
> >> >>
> >> >> "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> >> news:ibX4g.15296$Qz.1732@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> >I find your rant somewhat sexist, but leaving that aside I didn't
> > think
> >> >> >that Brinks actually sold their proprietary panels, I was under the
> >> >> >impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining
> >> >> >ownership
> >> >> >in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control and
> >> > freedom
> >> >> >of choice of their equipment at the end of the term without having to
> >> > worry
> >> >> >about the bottom feeders stealing their equipment for their own use.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Doug L
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:uAW4g.2873$1V4.226223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> >> Rant "ON"..
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Where the hell are the discussions and concerns about the customers
> >> >> >> rights in all this !! What right does Brinks have to sell a
> >> >> >> proprietary
> >> >> >> panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete
> >> >> >> control
> >> > and
> >> >> >> freedom of choice over HIS equipment at the end of the term ?
> >> >> >> Answer...they don't !!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***