Re: Take Over Practices

["R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You know, at first I thought that you just like a lot of small dealers that
can't see business past the end of their nose. Now I know it....

If you don't consider what is best for your customers as your top business
priority, then frankly, I don't see any hope for further discussion. Rather
than tell you what I REALLY think of your business methodology, lets just
drop it, otherwise this is quickly going to degrade into the usual vitriol
these discussions end with.....

Frankly, discussing alarm business with you bores me to death.....

RHC

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146509903.340121.299960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> R.H.Campbell wrote:
>> Ok, I see. In my day, HIS meant both genders; however, it seems things
>> are
>> interpreted differently these days....you know. like the Royal we....
>>
>> Damn ! I thought that post would stir up more indignation than that ! I
>> guess they got me figured out by now....
>>
>> RHC
>>
>
> Being figured out doesn't mean that you're right.
>
> People don't go into business for the benefit of their customers. The
> first objective is personal financial freedom and/or success.Giving
> benefits to the customer comes as a necessity to a business, in
> comparison to compitition, in order to be successful. ie. You give a
> customer what they want so that they will do business with you.
>
> Giving them what they don't want, to the detriment of the first
> objective, is stupidity.
>