[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Take Over Practices



"mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4454f2df$0$14522$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:ar55g.7$CU6.840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > You don't sue the customer. You send them a final invoice for the
balance
| of
| > the contract that he should have completed. If he doesn't pay you send
him
| > to collections.
|
| I see this, yes, and don't forget to chalk it up to an expense called bad
| debts :-)

Exactly...and there's always the remote chance they will pay up.

|
| >
| > Then you have your attorney (acutally I have a form letter) write up a
| > letter to the takeover company complaining of tortuious interference of
a
| > valid on-going contract and you threaten them with a lawsuit.
|
| and then what happens?
| Nothing and lawyer cashes your cheque.... why bother?

The lawyer cashed the check 10 years ago, I use a boilerplate he created for
me. In reality it's not worth pursuing, but you can at least make someone
uncomfortable for a few seconds.



|
|
| *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
|




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home