Re: Take Over Practices

["mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Khc5g.21$CU6.2055@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4454f2df$0$14522$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:ar55g.7$CU6.840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > You don't sue the customer. You send them a final invoice for the
> balance
> | of
> | > the contract that he should have completed. If he doesn't pay you send
> him
> | > to collections.
> |
> | I see this, yes, and don't forget to chalk it up to an expense called
bad
> | debts :-)
>
> Exactly...and there's always the remote chance they will pay up.

It don't look good on their credit report :-)

>
> |
> | >
> | > Then you have your attorney (acutally I have a form letter) write up a
> | > letter to the takeover company complaining of tortuious interference
of
> a
> | > valid on-going contract and you threaten them with a lawsuit.
> |
> | and then what happens?
> | Nothing and lawyer cashes your cheque.... why bother?
>
> The lawyer cashed the check 10 years ago, I use a boilerplate he created
for
> me. In reality it's not worth pursuing, but you can at least make someone
> uncomfortable for a few seconds.
>

Yes, I agree, that is fun. That's how the shysters get us... they bait you
with machismo (and line their pockets... KILL ALL THE LAWYERS!


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***