[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: pet sensors

Subject: Re: pet sensors
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 18:26:23 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <O9s8g.111882$tc.70666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <GXE9g.112$vH7.49@xxxxxxxx> <DzG9g.2645$iM3.2462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Paul Ekins" <pmekins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DzG9g.2645$iM3.2462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> SNIP > The ultimate sensors are made by Intellesense,
>
>
> I'm sorry to disagree, but I have worked on multiple government tenders
both
> in the UK and Australia, and both governments have required Optex
detectors
> be used.
> If Intellisense (formally C&K) are superior, why aren't they sprecified
for
> high end jobs.

Just because a government agency requires a sensor does not mean it's the
best

References:
- pet sensors
  - From: denise
- Re: pet sensors
  - From: Holger
- Re: pet sensors
  - From: Paul Ekins

Prev by Message: car alarm remote
Next by Message: Re: Motion Detector Ademco 998IP
Previous by thread: Re: pet sensors
Next by thread: Power Loss Alert / Alarm
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home