[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?

Subject: Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
From: "Hugeass" <Hugeass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:41:36 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1142390954.079463.312890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56gt12hbvuqja782gcj4v693risl82n2sl@xxxxxxx>

"Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:56gt12hbvuqja782gcj4v693risl82n2sl@xxxxxxxxxx
> On 14 Mar 2006 18:49:14 -0800, rogue_petunia@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

 ADT corporate has a good reputation.
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass

What reputation does Bassburlaralarms.com have ?
http://www.bbbwestflorida.org/commonreport.html?bid=41001663

References:
- difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
  - From: rogue_petunia
- Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Great deal, great product.
Next by Message: Re: alt.security.alarms Original Proposal Message
Previous by thread: Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
Next by thread: Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home