Re: Just a suggestion

["Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Most of us are able to know what the message is in reply too.  Should we
forget or need to clarify, then you can look below at the original question.
I guess it would be better if the responder snipped most of the extra text
from the reply, but having to go through 4 or 5 screens to get to the answer
is a huge waste of time.

"John J" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kpLlg.38473$No1.5202@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:8jKlg.119492$dW3.20695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "John J" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:WQJlg.1032726$xm3.353326@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:8tJlg.69628$4L1.38695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> .... and top post so you don't have to scroll down to the bottom of the
>>>> message....
>>>
>>> Top posting is for fools and losers
>>>
>> Why do you say that?
>
> Beacuse we read from top to bottom, also its been the standard for many
> years, well before MS got into the market.
>
> http://www.dickgaughan.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq08-topp.html
> http://www.redballoon.net/~snorwood/quote-rant.shtml
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html
>
>
>