Re: PRIVACY is an INHERENT HUMAN RIGHT

["McGinn" <McGinn@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Frank Olson" <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1Mqmg.75687$Mn5.17740@xxxxxxxxxxx
> McGinn wrote:
>> <Strabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:h6qh929fn8bggca1subf62btci83inn6uf@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:48:29 -0700, "McGinn" <McGinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"McGinn" <McGinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>news:4495fd9f$0$23732$a8266bb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>>>An official of the Los Angeles County
>>>>>>Sheriff's Department was interviewed
>>>>>>regarding a report that the county
>>>>>>will, sometime this month, begin
>>>>>>utilizing an unmanned "drone" aircraft
>>>>>>for surveillance purposes. In response
>>>>>>to the question that this might create
>>>>>>a "big brother" system, he stated:
>>>>>>"you have nothing to fear from your
>>>>>>own government - you are being watched
>>>>>>by your fellow citizens."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Do you guys know that NSA has alleast 50,000 american civilians on their
>>>>payroll COVERTLY SPYING on the REST of the americans ?
>>>
>>>Post the list.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> List of UNDERCOVER EVIL AMERICAN GOVT NSA and FBI PSYCHOPATHS and their
>> ADDRESSES and PHONE NUMBERS.
>>
>>
>> The FIRST TWO agents Maddelina Wahl and Kathleen Taylor are listed on
>> www.infospace.com under their UNDERCOVER AGENTS HUSBANDS names Larry Wahl
>> and Kevin Taylor.
>>
>>
>> 1) Agent Maddelina Wahl , 28087 Hickory Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 38331
>> ph 248-324-1527.
>>
>>
>> 2) Agent Kathleen Taylor, 29390 Bermuda Lane, Southfield, MI 48034, Ph
>> 248-356-1946.
>>
>>
>> 3) Agent Mediha Krijestorac, 30408 Shiawasee Rd, Farmington MI 48336, ph
>> 248-477-9161.
>>
>>
>> 4) Agent Frank Spodek, email id:   sfrank9 at aol.com or sfrank9@xxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> 5) 351 FTK - Atlanta, Georgia car registration in Sep 2004 (undercover
>> agents)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>How do you know your neighbor is NOT ONE OF THEM ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>     The Value of Privacy
>>>>>
>>>>>Last month, revelation of yet another NSA surveillance effort against
>>>>>the American people rekindled the privacy debate.  Those in favor of
>>>>>these programs have trotted out the same rhetorical question we hear
>>>>>every time privacy advocates oppose ID checks, video cameras, massive
>>>>>databases, data mining, and other wholesale surveillance measures: "If
>>>>>you aren't doing anything wrong, what do you have to hide?"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Some clever answers: "If I'm not doing anything wrong, then you have no
>>>>>cause to watch me." "Because the government gets to define what's
>>>>>wrong, and they keep changing the definition." "Because you might do
>>>>>something wrong with my information." My problem with quips like these
>>>>>-- as right as they are -- is that they accept the premise that privacy
>>>>>is about hiding a wrong. It's not. Privacy is an inherent human right,
>>>>>and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and
>>>>>respect.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Two proverbs say it best: "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" ("Who
>>>>>watches the watchers?") and "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Cardinal Richelieu understood the value of surveillance when he
>>>>>famously said, "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of
>>>>>the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him
>>>>>hanged." Watch someone long enough, and you'll find something to arrest
>>>>>-- or just blackmail -- him with. Privacy is important because without
>>>>>it, surveillance information will be abused: to peep, to sell to
>>>>>marketers, and to spy on political enemies -- whoever they happen to be
>>>>>at the time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Privacy protects us from abuses by those in power, even if we're doing
>>>>>nothing wrong at the time of surveillance.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>We do nothing wrong when we make love or go to the bathroom. We are not
>>>>>deliberately hiding anything when we seek out private places for
>>>>>reflection or conversation. We keep private journals, sing in the
>>>>>privacy of the shower, and write letters to secret lovers and then burn
>>>>>them. Privacy is a basic human need.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>A future in which privacy would face constant assault was so alien to
>>>>>the framers of the Constitution that it never occurred to them to call
>>>>>out privacy as an explicit right. Privacy was inherent to the nobility
>>>>>of their being and their cause. Of course being watched in your own
>>>>>home was unreasonable. Watching at all was an act so unseemly as to be
>>>>>inconceivable among gentlemen in their day. You watched convicted
>>>>>criminals, not free citizens. You ruled your own home. It's intrinsic
>>>>>to the concept of liberty.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>For if we are observed in all matters, we are constantly under threat
>>>>>of correction, judgment, criticism, even plagiarism of our own
>>>>>uniqueness. We become children, fettered under watchful eyes,
>>>>>constantly fearful that -- either now or in the uncertain future --
>>>>>patterns we leave behind will be brought back to implicate us, by
>>>>>whatever authority has now become focused upon our once-private and
>>>>>innocent acts. We lose our individuality, because everything we do is
>>>>>observable and recordable.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>How many of us have paused during conversations in the past
>>>>>four-and-a-half years, suddenly aware that we might be eavesdropped on?
>>>>>Probably it was a phone conversation, although maybe it was an e-mail
>>>>>or instant message exchange or a conversation in a public place. Maybe
>>>>>the topic was terrorism, or politics, or Islam. We stop suddenly,
>>>>>momentarily afraid that our words might be taken out of context, then
>>>>>we laugh at our paranoia and go on. But our demeanor has changed, and
>>>>>our words are subtly altered.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>This is the loss of freedom we face when our privacy is taken from us.
>>>>>This was life in the former East Germany, or life in Saddam Hussein's
>>>>>Iraq. And it's our future as we allow an ever-intrusive eye into our
>>>>>personal, private lives.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Too many wrongly characterize the debate as "security versus privacy."
>>>>>The real choice is liberty versus control. Tyranny, whether it arises
>>>>>under threat of foreign physical attack or under constant domestic
>>>>>authoritative scrutiny, is still tyranny. Liberty requires security
>>>>>without intrusion, security plus privacy. Widespread police
>>>>>surveillance is the very definition of a police state. And that's why
>>>>>we should champion privacy even when we have nothing to hide.
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>
>
> Don't know about you guys, but what I find particularly funny
>about this "McQuim" character is that he's going on and on about "psychos"
>invading *his* privacy and then posts the private addresses of a half dozen
>fellow Americans...  in multiple Newsgroups...





Frank Olson MORON,


Do you PROBLEMS comprehending BASIC ENGLISH ?

They are FBI and NSA SADISTIC, PERVERTED, BLOOD THIRSTY PSYCHOPATHS.

Which part of me RETALIATING and DESTROYING the FBI and NSA PSYCHOPATHS
PRIVACY by posting them to multiple groups YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE
understanding WITH YOUR MOLE SLAVISH BRAIN ?

If they are private addresses of JUST PRIVATE AMERICANS, then WHY DONT YOU
CALL THEM at the numbers and TELL THEM TO FILE A LAW SUIT and a CRIMINAL
CASE against ME for making WRONGFUL ACCUSATIONS ?


You DONT want to do that because you are a FUCKING MOLE BRAINED MORON and
SLAVE of EVIL FBI and NSA PSYCHOPATHS.