Re: How does one find employees, including trainees?

["Tommy" <tommy at leesecurity dot net>]

This is a futile argument. we disagree and that is that. the world wont
end because if it. and as for the shot without provocation, touchy,
touchy. if you can't take a shot every once and a while what fun is it?
i don't have the burning hatred for you that some seem to here. you
were just an easy target in this instance.

So chill out and take a ride on your sccoter, scooter.
--



Robert L Bass wrote:

> > I still disagree, continuity is "0" resistance to current flow. it
> > does that by putins voltage on the line and seeing if it has
> > current at the other lead, if that isn't ohm's law, what is?
>
> As stated earlier, you are wrong.  That is not Ohm's law and it does
> not require knowledge of Ohm's law to operate a continuity tester.
>
> > as it happens i understand quite well how and
> > why a "volt-ohm" meter works...
>
> That doesn't mean that you know Ohm's law.  That just means you know
> how to use a VOM meter.  The one does not imply the other and,
> according to contrapositive logic, the other does not require the one.
>
> Note: Whether you do or do not know Ohm's law is not being
> questioned.  It is only the idea that one must know Ohm's law to do
> this work and that one needs to understand Ohm's law to use a
> continuity tester.
>
> > so let me say this back to you, "Since you obviously
> > don't understand what "feedback" your continuity
> > tester is giving, you clearly don't understand the
> > instrument itself.  Whether you actually happen to
> > know Ohm's law or not is irrelavent."
>
> The funny thing is I can quote you Ohm's law and I can explain it to
> you.  I had to answer several questions related to Ohm's law on my
> license application some decades ago.  Yet I've probably needed to
> actually use Ohm's law two or three times at most during the decades
> I've been in the industry.
>
> > As for the snipe, i'm really not trying to be
> > harsh...
>
> No, you simply took a pot shot without provocation.  That's par for
> the course in ASA.
>
> > but you have tried to give the impression that
> > doing this job is ".... where monkeys can be
> > trained to do a better job than some "professionals."
> > quote by RLB.
>
> Indeed I have seen work by some professionals that probably could
> have been done better by a trained monkey.  If you decide to be
> honest about this you'll have to admit having seen some sloppy,
> witless, "professional" installations as well.
>
> The reality is that alarm installation is not rocket science.  Anyone
> with a modicum of tool skills and a bit of patience can be taught to
> DIY an effective, comprehensive security system.  The other reality
> is that most people have neither the time nor the inclination to DIY.
> That's fine with me.  I'm perfectly happy catering to the niche
> market of people who want to do their own installation.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com