[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CID

Subject: Re: CID
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:53:16 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <JRAwg.7975$6G3.7096@trnddc05> <g6ydnX3EX4rjc1_ZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <44c3a356$0$17330$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BaCdnXUy8rM0dl7ZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

"Robert L Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BaCdnXUy8rM0dl7ZnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I know the FBII XL-4 allowed you to customize the codes.  It was a pain
> > too.
>
> It would be far better if they stuck to the standard or at least left the
> option to auto-select standard codes by setting a single data point.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass

It would be far better if FBI allowed you to do that which it doesn't.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CID
  - From: ET

References:
- CID
  - From: ET
- Re: CID
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: CID
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: CID
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Napco MA3000 - Dialer Test on both Lines?
Next by Message: Re: NSA PSYCHOPATH Steve Foley will also get into Police Computers tomorrow
Previous by thread: Re: CID
Next by thread: Re: CID
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home