Re: wire vs wired

["Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank God for Roy and his inventions......... :-))

"Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C2qHf.44$tm6.15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Joe,
> I basically send one man on most jobs.  If it is big, like a church or
> multiple warehouses, then I send a second with him.  We are fully equipped
> with the tools from labor savings devices, www.lsdinc.com and one man can
> do most any job.
> Allan
>
> "JoeRaisin" <joeraisin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:gOlHf.3$Pn5.2@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Just curious Crash, when you send out your installer, do you send them
>> out alone or in teams?
>>
>> Obviously the size of a job has an affect, huge jobs of course a team and
>> tiny ones solo...
>>
>> But for an average job...
>>
>>
>>
>> Crash Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> If you can afford the cost of post wiring a house go for wired. If not
>>> wireless is a very effective solution.
>>>
>>> These days most clients I have don't want to  have me crawling around
>>> they're house for 3 or 4 days trying to post wire an impossible
>>> home...much less pay me do a wired job when we can install 20+ opening
>>> wireless in 4-8 hours.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Harry Dope" <mskapik1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:rd1Hf.18942$Fw6.18485@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> | Having a security system installed in my house. ADT
>>> | is pushing for wireless. I thought hard wired was better
>>> | Any help is appreciated
>>> |
>>> |
>
>