Re: Florida Statute According to RLB

["Roland" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Someone needs to send Bass a new box of adult diapers. I am sure he has gone
through the last ones he had crapping his pants laughing so hard and you
guys.

"Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kJhkh.11362$_X.9958@xxxxxxxxx
> Post the link where you read your interpetation and I'll show you where it
> changed. Since you posted the wrong statute to begin with, I have know
> idea
> where to start.  I don't know where you would have read it. As far as RBL
> and the enforcement goes, keep up with the thread. I have already said,
> the
> state wouldn't do anything on their own. He stepped on someone's toes a
> year
> ago and got investigated. He slipped by on that one. They must, by law,
> investigate complaints, but he is really not a threat to the health,
> safety
> and welfare of the public as stated in the statute to be a big concern to
> them. In other words he isn't worth the time or money.  His BBB report may
> come to their attention by wat of a consumer complaint. Again, I don't
> give
> two rats asses about his activities, just his over inflated ego. I have
> been
> asked to stop since it is boring. I don't if it was his activities or his
> ego that is boring, but either way I heard what they said.
>
> "Si Ballenger" <shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net> wrote in message
> news:459195e2.228254140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:53:37 -0500, "Bob Worthy"
>> <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >The State Statute that govern alarm system activities is F.S. Chapter
>> >489
>> >Part II, as well as, a Rules Chapter, which I will let RLB find for
> himself
>> >and a Florida Administrative Code Chapter of the Florida Statutes. There
> is
>> >also the Uniform Building Code and Florida Fire Pervention Code and the
>> >State Fire Marshals Statute. These are also enforced by the Electrical
>> >Contractors Licensing Board of the Department of Business and
> Professional
>> >Regulation along with interrelated Regulatory Agencies like the
> Department
>> >of State, Department of Financial Services, the IRS, and the State
>> >Department of Revenue.You quoted out of Chapter 489 Part I. This is the
>> >statute that is governed by the Contractors Industry Licencing Board.
>> >Although they are a State board, they are not even located in
> Tallahassee.
>> >They are located in Jacksonville, FL. The CLIB is the board that handles
> all
>> >other trades, ie plumbers, roofers, AC contractors, etc. They have
> nothing
>> >to do with electrical or low voltage. Alarm contracting is very well
> defined
>> >in the proper statute.
>> >
>> >Not when I have been involved legislatively over the last nine years to
>> >craft the statute as it is written today and to teach the statute to the
>> >state investigators, as to how it pertains to our industry. Those that
> skim
>> >read, don't deal with the Attorney General's office, think they are
>> >above
>> >the law, and don't keep up with the changes after the legislative
>> >session
> is
>> >over are the ones to be easily confused.
>>
>> Interesting point. I would think that with nine years of training
>> the investigators would act to stop the alleged violations
>> (supposidly reported to the state by various posters here over
>> the years) . Seeing how they haven't I would guess that the
>> alleged violations are not valid, or the state of Florida just
>> doesn't care about actual enforcement. As for alarm contracting,
>> the statute I read states that an alarm contractor is one who
>> engages in a contract for compensation. With no contract or no
>> compensation, the state probably has no case (probably why they
>> never act on the issue). As for the electrical part, I doubt that
>> much has changed in the last couple of years since I read thru
>> the applicable statutes. Back then a license was needed if a
>> person was performing actual wiring installation/maintaince, or
>> directing the activities of those performing actual wiring
>> installation/maintaince. Since you are very familiar with the
>> subject, post up a link that shows that this has changed.
>
>