[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bend Over Practices



I made a spelling mistake so where's my red white and brue fwiend?
Hmmmm, maybe the change in subject will draw him out.

"mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:...
> spankling is the less sexist form of spanking
> but it still hurts
>
> "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:445559ed$0$14481$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > hahahahahahaha, don't go getting your balls all tied in a knot, Bob....
> > scan down...
> > you said HIS equipment and Doug caught you fair and sqaure.
> > So bend over, brace yourself against that wall and take your spankling
> like
> > a man.
> >
> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:qw85g.182$VV2.16678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > How so ? I don't see anything in it relating to gender which might
make
> it
> > > "sexist". I figured it would get some people going based on the
content,
> > but
> > > never based on it being a "sexist" remark.
> > >
> > > Maybe I'm too "old school" to understand; maybe you young guys could
> > explain
> > > how its sexist....
> > >
> > > RHC
> > >
> > > "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:4454f25f$0$14454$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Yep, I concur... it was a sexist post, Bob.
> > > >
> > > > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:nf25g.41$ix6.8806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> Sexist ???!!! I've been called a lot of things, but never sexist
> > before.
> > > > But
> > > >> you're right, if the equipment is leased, they can do what they
want
> > with
> > > >> it. I understood (it seems incorrectly) that Brinks sold their
> > > >> hardware...
> > > >>
> > > >> But sexist.....???
> > > >>
> > > >> RHC
> > > >>
> > > >> "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > >> news:ibX4g.15296$Qz.1732@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> >I find your rant somewhat sexist, but leaving that aside I didn't
> > think
> > > >> >that Brinks actually sold their proprietary panels, I was under
the
> > > >> >impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining
> > > >> >ownership
> > > >> >in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control
and
> > > > freedom
> > > >> >of choice of their equipment at the end of the term without having
> to
> > > > worry
> > > >> >about the bottom feeders stealing their equipment for their own
use.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Doug L
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > >> > news:uAW4g.2873$1V4.226223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> >> Rant "ON"..
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Where the hell are the discussions and concerns about the
> customers
> > > >> >> rights in all this !! What right does Brinks have to sell a
> > > >> >> proprietary
> > > >> >> panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete
> control
> > > > and
> > > >> >> freedom of choice over HIS equipment at the end of the term ?
> > > >> >> Answer...they don't !!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
***
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
>
>


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home