[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PC5132-433 NA (Version 4.2)

Subject: Re: PC5132-433 NA (Version 4.2)
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 23:07:49 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <atSdnQvvPIyQuYreRVn-rQ@xxxxxxxxxxx> <A1LRe.16909$sY6.136606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <qo-dnYcBVt2HKYreRVn-tg@xxxxxxxxxx>

"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qo-dnYcBVt2HKYreRVn-tg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Petem...question. Have you had good luck doing this. I have been told that
> doing this creates an antenna that can pick up disturbance. Supposedly,
the
> length of wire from the transmitter to the contact(s), has to be quite
> short....10 inches comes to mind if my memory serves me right
>
> What is your experience with making the wire lengths longer than
recommended
> ?
>
> RHC

That was the original wireless sensors, later WLS925's can go quite a bit
farther in distance

References:
- PC5132-433 NA (Version 4.2)
  - From: Claude Rodriguez
- Re: PC5132-433 NA (Version 4.2)
  - From: petem
- Re: PC5132-433 NA (Version 4.2)
  - From: R.H.Campbell

Prev by Message: Quality and professional knowledge
Next by Message: Re: "Vulgar" zone words sent to monitoring?
Previous by thread: Re: PC5132-433 NA (Version 4.2)
Next by thread: Re: PC5132-433 NA (Version 4.2)
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home