Re: "Blanks" kill actors

["Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Shaun Eli" <missingchild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126578793.293841.27990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Oh, you're against laws that require kids to wear bike helmets?  You
> think kids shouldn't be safe because they have uneducated or uncaring
> parents, or parents who aren't watching them 24/7?  THAT is uncaring.
>
This is exactly the point people like you just don't get, and even when it
comes directly out of your mouth. Suddenly you're an expert on everyone
else's kids. You're assuming, much like the liberals, and governments, that
live for ways to invade the civil liberties of its citizens, that you're
suddenly experts on parenting. It's not that anyone is caring, or uncaring.
These laws don't effect much of reality, they provide a "feel good" for the
liberal who thinks he or she is doing something good. But that's where it
ends. Reality is, you don't give two shits about other people's kids, nor do
you know them, or their parents. You can give verbal indication that you do,
so people get the warm and fuzzy you're a good person, but, the bottom line
is, in reality, it's just a speech.
Does the law contain a fund, for kids who wear helmets, and are injured from
an accident, money for medical bills? Probably not. Does the law contain a
fine to parents who's kids are injured who weren't wearing a helmet?
Probably so. How does either benefit the welfare of the child? Neither does.
It just assumes those parents are irresponsible. But in the eyes of the
idiots creating these laws, it gives them a feeling that it will protect the
welfare of a child.
It's almost as ludicrous as saying maybe the State should qualify
individuals before even having kids. Problem with a law like would be that
the State wouldn't be able to deny responsibility.
Good lord! Imagine being held accountable for your in-actions....that would
be un-American.