[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compass Software



You guys are gonna give yourselves ulcers, or heartattacks.





"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1129697908.444026.67390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| R.H.Campbell wrote:
| > No, I don't say RLB's an OK guy, nor do I say he is the monster you say
he
| > is. I simply don't know; I have never met the man. I judge people on the
| > newsgroup by what they say and how they act in relation to answering
| > questions etc on security matters. That's all any of us are here for.
| >
| > I see him answering people's questions in a straightforward way,
although
| > like all of us, he is not always correct. He gets offensive when
attached in
| > the most vicious ways by you and others. His motives for being on the
| > newsgroup are to help others and to sell his wares to DIY'ers, but at
least
| > he answers DIY questions without making them feel stupid or belittling
them
| > for their lack of knowledge.  You on the other hand,often fill the
newsgroup
| > with hateful, ignorant crap that does nothing to assist anyone here. So
when
| > it comes right down to it, who's more of a problem here...
| >
| > To use your own words, "you've proved my opinion of you to be
| > accurate...again"
|
|
|
| R.H.Campbell wrote:
| > No, I don't say RLB's an OK guy, nor do I say he is the monster you say
he
| > is. I simply don't know; I have never met the man. I judge people on the
| > newsgroup by what they say and how they act in relation to answering
| > questions etc on security matters. That's all any of us are here for.
| >
| > I see him answering people's questions in a straightforward way,
although
| > like all of us, he is not always correct. He gets offensive when
attached in
| > the most vicious ways by you and others. His motives for being on the
| > newsgroup are to help others and to sell his wares to DIY'ers, but at
least
| > he answers DIY questions without making them feel stupid or belittling
them
| > for their lack of knowledge.  You on the other hand,often fill the
newsgroup
| > with hateful, ignorant crap that does nothing to assist anyone here. So
when
| > it comes right down to it, who's more of a problem here...
| >
| > To use your own words, "you've proved my opinion of you to be
| > accurate...again"
|
| Ok Bobby boy,
|
| Let's get it on.
|
| You want to tell me who it is that's the cause of all ..... THAT IS
| *****ALL**** the people in this group of going after Shit for Brains
| Bass? Is it me? Is it YOU? Is it anybody but that stupid son of a bitch
| himself? What is it that makes everyone ....... THATS EVERYONE BUT
| ***** YOU ***** dislike him. I never started ONE FUCKING THING with
| him. He's the one who ALWAYS starts it and it always IS him. There are
| people here who say that ignoring him is the way to go. But yet they
| themselves don't ignore him.  YOU can ignore him if you want to. I say,
| that if you ignore someone like him you're simply saying that what he
| does is ok. And it's NOT ok. IT IS NOT OK!!!!!!! If no one ever stands
| up and says that what he is doing is wrong then it becomes acceptable.
| YOU can be one of those do-nothing people ..... but I'M NOT! And if you
| want to condone what he does, that's YOUR fucking problem. I really
| don't give a shit WHAT you think or WHAT you do. I'll simply use that
| FAT ASSHOLEs method. I'LL do what ever the hell I want in this group
| and you don't have any say in what I or anyone does here. If you don't
| like it, you can leave. Sound familiar? Something that I NEVER would
| have EVER considered saying in this or ANY where, prior to coming
| across that nasty, arrogant son of a bitch. And if you can accept that
| attitude from him, you've got to accept it from anybody else who
| chooses to do the same things he does. Or, ..... are you really that
| proud to be the hypocrite that I think you are?  And I'll continue
| doing what I do and how I do it, simply to exemplfiy EXACTLY what that
| rotten bastard does to everyone in this group, by his conduct. If you
| can accept all of the shit that that cocksucker hands out in this group
| and what he's done and does to other people here and you can't tolerate
| what ***** I ***** do, then you've got to re-evaluate what what your
| sense of values are. I've NEVER done a FRACTION of the things to people
| here, that HE's done.  And the fact that I purposely use foul language
| to bring my point home about what's tolerable and what's not, and you
| take exception to that ..... but not HIS depravity, .... certainly
| shows that YOU'VE got some twisted sense of values. Why is it that
| profanity brings you out of your stupid naive little shell, whereby you
| think you have good reason to openely object to what **** I **** do,
| but with ALL of the dirty rotten things that that fucking bastard has
| done to people .... for YEARS AND YEARS you never make comment?  Why is
| what I do here, purposely and intentionally, any different than what
| you tolerate from him? A little confused about what's right and wrong
| Bobby boy?  I'd say so.
|
| You tell me, is it ok to call someones employer and tell lies about
| them?
| Is it ok to go to a competitors website and tell lies about them?
| Is it ok to steal someones post and information and claim it as their
| own?
| Is it ok to lie about being in the installation business just to fool
| end users into buying from him?
| Is it ok to belittle people for using wrong words or berating them
| because they have different way of doing things?
| Is it ok to berate the installation trade so that he can sell his
| equipment?
| AD INFINITUM
| And how does all that that son of a bitch has done to people, compare
| to me using profanity and objecting to his arrogant and depraved and
| unacceptable conduct? And how is that you don't object to others who
| openly object to him? Certainly Frank posts just as much or more
| objections than I do. So is it simply the profanity that sticks in your
| craw?  We'll good. Because that's the very reason I do it. I know damn
| fucking well that it makes EVERYONE uneasy and that it makes this group
| look bad to others coming here. And that's EXACTLY the same thing that
| Shit for Brains does. What I do here is done willfully and purposely,
| in the same manner as he does what he does. AND WHY NOT? Will the group
| be any better with just HIM fouling it up? If you object to me, and not
| him, you'd damn well better get ready for more of this, because it's
| NEVER going to go away as long as he continues to be the nasty bastard
| that he is. And ANYone who objects to me had damn well better object to
| what he does also.
|
| "This is an Alt Newsgroup. No one has any control what goes on here or
| have any say in what anyone does. And if you don't like it ....... you
| can leave"
|
| When he stops taking that attitude when his bad conduct is criticized,
| then so will I.
|
| Got it?
| If not ..... it's basicly, ..... If you can shut your yap about what he
| does, you'd damn well better keep what you think about what I do  .....
| to yourself also.
|
|
| If not ... Unlike .... how you've become accustomed to Fat Ass's
| conduct, I'll be very happy to continue this dialog in the "flowery
| vernacular" that I hope you'll never become accustomed to ......
| forever
|
| And if you'll notice ...... You should take note of exactly WHO it was
| that got your name and my response, involved with this.  Does it look
| like a familiar scenario to you? You simply got sucked in ........
| again.
|
| Toodles......
|
| >
| > "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1129609549.429757.137840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > >
| > > Mark Leuck wrote:
| > >>
| > >> Why aren't you ragging Crash for not slamming RLB like you do RH
| > >> Campbell?
| > >
| > > Because Campbell actually says that SFB is an OK guy and thinks that
| > > it's everybody else who causes the problems.
| > >
| > > Crash at least knows what's going on, and occasionally let's his
| > > opinion be known but (mostly) chooses to stay out of it.
| > >
| > > But you've proved my opinion of you to be accurate ....... again.
| > >
|
|
|
|
| >
| > RHC
| >
| > "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1129609549.429757.137840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > >
| > > Mark Leuck wrote:
| > >>
| > >> Why aren't you ragging Crash for not slamming RLB like you do RH
| > >> Campbell?
| > >
| > > Because Campbell actually says that SFB is an OK guy and thinks that
| > > it's everybody else who causes the problems.
| > >
| > > Crash at least knows what's going on, and occasionally let's his
| > > opinion be known but (mostly) chooses to stay out of it.
| > >
| > > But you've proved my opinion of you to be accurate ....... again.
| > >
|




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home